1968
DOI: 10.1177/001872086801000105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Estimation of Vehicular Velocity as a Function of Visual Stimulation

Abstract: This study reports an investigation of the ability of subjects to estimate the velocity of the vehicle in which they travel. The experiment restricted sensory stimulation to the visual modality. The factor of interest is locus of retinal stimulation. Velocity and acceleration were the other variables. Time of observation was held constant to one second. Results show that the locus of retinal stimulation is significant in determining the accuracy of the estimates. Peripheral visual stimulation results in more a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that the peripheral flow is a more effective speed cue than the flow from the road. This is in accordance with the results reported by Salvatore (1968). In his experiments participants had to estimate their speed with only peripheral or only foveal view on a highway.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results suggest that the peripheral flow is a more effective speed cue than the flow from the road. This is in accordance with the results reported by Salvatore (1968). In his experiments participants had to estimate their speed with only peripheral or only foveal view on a highway.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is identical for all viewers, and is related to the peripheral cue in the real driving situation. There is evidence that for the real driving situation, the peripheral information is of much greater importance in estimating speed than the frontal cue (Salvatore 1968 b), so we would expect the distance effect to be much less than that implied by Equation (6), and the observed value of 11 per cent seems not unreasonable.…”
Section: Evansmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In their studies, Cohen et al [24] noticed that when crossing a road, men tend to accept smaller gaps between vehicles than women do. Salvatore [25] points out that male have much less stringent judgments than women about the speed of the motor.…”
Section: Results: Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%