The Ethical Limits of Blockchain-Enabled Markets for Private IoT Data

Abstract

This paper looks at the development of blockchain technologies that promise to bring new tools for the management of private data, providing enhanced security and privacy to individuals. Particular interest presents solutions aimed at reorganizing data flows in the Internet of Things (IoT) architectures, enabling the secure and decentralized exchange of data between network participants. However, as this paper argues, the promised benefits are counterbalanced by a significant shift towards the propertization of private data, underlying these proposals. Considering the unique capacity of blockchain technology applications to imitate and even replace traditional institutions, this aspect may present certain challenges, both of technical and ethical character. In order to highlight these challenges and associated concerns, this paper identifies the underlying techno-economic factors and normative assumptions defining the development of these solutions amounting to technologically enabled propertization. It is argued that without careful consideration of a wider impact, such blockchain applications could have effects opposite to the intended ones, thus contributing to the erosion of privacy for IoT users.

Business Data Sharing through Data Marketplaces: A Systematic Literature Review

“…This category also discusses the implications of data trading for social, political, economic, and cultural contexts [5]. Finally, many articles discuss the topic of exploitation of individual data in personal data marketplaces [120][121][122][123].…”

Survival Study on Blockchain Based 6G-Enabled Mobile Edge Computation for IoT Automation

“…However, resource optimization was not performed. The techno-economic factors and normative assumptions were taken in [20] to enable the propertization. Blockchain applications include the results opposite to intended ones for contributing the IoT based user privacy.…”

Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems

“…Such proposals essentially run into the fallacy that free-market mechanisms can bring about morally desirable outcomes—assumption largely construed on the idealised representation of the rationality of such markets. What these assumptions, however, largely ignore is a risk that such market mechanisms would rather fit into the structures of existing private data markets, replicating and even exaggerating moral risks associated with the private data propertization (Ishmaev 2019 ).…”