2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?

Abstract: Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides a more in-depth insight into innovation processes and their determinants. Studies suggest that in the FB, the level of investments in innovations is statistically lower than in their nonfamily counterparts (Duran et al, 2016) Going deeper into the relationships between innovation input, innovation output and organizational performance literature review suggests that innovation input and innovation output are interrelated constructs (Craig, Pohjola, Kraus, & Jensen, 2014;Janger, Schubert, Andries, Rammer, & Hoskens, 2017;Klomp & Van Leeuwen, 2001). In particular, Kijek and Kijek (2010) find out that expenditures on innovation (i.e., innovation input) are strongly related to the introduction of new products or services; however, other researchers prove that the nature of this relationship is not necessarily linear (Mudambi & Swift, 2011;Yayavaram & Chen, 2015), and that is the result of the differences in the efficiency of transforming input into the output.…”
Section: Familiness Innovation and Performance In Fbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a more in-depth insight into innovation processes and their determinants. Studies suggest that in the FB, the level of investments in innovations is statistically lower than in their nonfamily counterparts (Duran et al, 2016) Going deeper into the relationships between innovation input, innovation output and organizational performance literature review suggests that innovation input and innovation output are interrelated constructs (Craig, Pohjola, Kraus, & Jensen, 2014;Janger, Schubert, Andries, Rammer, & Hoskens, 2017;Klomp & Van Leeuwen, 2001). In particular, Kijek and Kijek (2010) find out that expenditures on innovation (i.e., innovation input) are strongly related to the introduction of new products or services; however, other researchers prove that the nature of this relationship is not necessarily linear (Mudambi & Swift, 2011;Yayavaram & Chen, 2015), and that is the result of the differences in the efficiency of transforming input into the output.…”
Section: Familiness Innovation and Performance In Fbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these variables represent kinds of knowledge output and cannot represent the contributions of innovation to economic development. New indicators, such as the output value of new products or high-tech industries, are more convincing [77]; hence, the paper takes the output value of the biotechnology industry to indicate innovation output.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tools such as Innovation Indicator are not only used as a purely informational basis but also feed into evidence based policy advice, e.g. country specific recommendations within the Europe 2020 strategy or smart specialisation initiatives, the adequacy of the information provided becomes crucial (Janger et al 2017).…”
Section: The Fifth Freedom Of Innovation Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%