2023
DOI: 10.2478/ie-2023-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU’s Quest for Strategic Raw Materials: What Role for Mining and Recycling?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the main obstacles to cleantech investment in the EU are skills and access to funding [121], and the prolonged lead times for CRM extraction projects are primarily attributed to the exploration and project preparation phase, which falls under the responsibility of mining companies [120]. Moreover, fast-track permit processes, along with other features of the two proposed regulations (such as the lack of limits to the EU consumption of CRMs and the definition of net-zero technologies only based on their GHG emissions, without any consideration for their further environmental impacts), risk weakening social and environmental safeguards [124][125][126]. The idea that improved self-sufficiency could come at the expense of environmental/social protection blows beyond EU industrial policy, affecting, e.g., the recent Commission proposal on new genomic techniques (NGTs) [78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the main obstacles to cleantech investment in the EU are skills and access to funding [121], and the prolonged lead times for CRM extraction projects are primarily attributed to the exploration and project preparation phase, which falls under the responsibility of mining companies [120]. Moreover, fast-track permit processes, along with other features of the two proposed regulations (such as the lack of limits to the EU consumption of CRMs and the definition of net-zero technologies only based on their GHG emissions, without any consideration for their further environmental impacts), risk weakening social and environmental safeguards [124][125][126]. The idea that improved self-sufficiency could come at the expense of environmental/social protection blows beyond EU industrial policy, affecting, e.g., the recent Commission proposal on new genomic techniques (NGTs) [78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing circular economy (CE) approaches for batteries such as recycling and/or reuse in secondary applications holds the potential to deliver benefits in terms of alleviating environmental pressures from battery production [10,11]. Recovering materials from EoL batteries can also support the domestic supply of critical raw materials for the green and digital transition, which has recently become a flagship priority for the EU [12]. Even though there is an expanding literature on the CE [13,14], only a few studies explore barriers to implementing such approaches in the battery sector [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%