2022
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European Economic Area: Decision‐Shaping during the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Abstract: The COVID‐19 crisis provides important examples whereby Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (the EEA EFTA States) deemed it necessary to influence the content of EU rules. Despite participating in the internal market through the EEA Agreement, they were not initially excluded from the EU's restrictions on the export of personal protective equipment and later the export of vaccines against COVID‐19, and they sought to reverse these decisions. This article explores how the EEA EFTA States influenced EU policy in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By way of derogation, pursuant to Article 128(5) of the Withdrawal Agreement (Official Journal of the EU 2019), during the transition period, representatives or experts of or designated by the UK could, upon invitation, exceptionally attend meetings of expert groups, and bodies, offices or agencies when the discussions concerned individual acts to be addressed during the transition period. The presence of the UK was necessary and in the interest of the Union, in particular for the effective implementation of Union law during the transition period without voting rights (Jonsdottir 2023). Post-Brexit, the UK no longer enjoys access to the Union's decision-making procedures.…”
Section: Application and Justifications Of Decision-making Autonomy: ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By way of derogation, pursuant to Article 128(5) of the Withdrawal Agreement (Official Journal of the EU 2019), during the transition period, representatives or experts of or designated by the UK could, upon invitation, exceptionally attend meetings of expert groups, and bodies, offices or agencies when the discussions concerned individual acts to be addressed during the transition period. The presence of the UK was necessary and in the interest of the Union, in particular for the effective implementation of Union law during the transition period without voting rights (Jonsdottir 2023). Post-Brexit, the UK no longer enjoys access to the Union's decision-making procedures.…”
Section: Application and Justifications Of Decision-making Autonomy: ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'The EU dominates the associated non-members-it makes them "rule takers" because of the agreements' built-in asymmetries' (Eriksen, 2018(Eriksen, , p. 1000. Whilst these institutionalized arrangements form an inside-out perspective, third countries also shape EU rules (Jonsdottir, 2022;Kuhn and Trondal, 2023;Lavenex and Öberg, 2023;Schwok and Najv, 2023). Third countries gain access to the EU institutions through these processes of policy opt-ins (Ganzle et al, 2019) and the extension of EU jurisdiction granted (Frommelt and Gstöhl, 2023).…”
Section: Understanding Third Country Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the precise nature of how non-members exert an influence on the EU from an outside-in perspective varies based on their relative power (Jonsdottir, 2022), their objectives to accede to the EU (Müftüler-Baç, 2016;Schwok and Najv, 2023) and the EU's receptiveness towards these third countries either as potential members or as non-members opting into EU policies (Frommelt and Gstöhl, 2023;Kuhn and Trondal, 2023). Third country influence rests on access to the EU via formal and informal channelsthrough institutional set-ups in the former, and social interactions and contacts with policy-makers and bilateral relations with Member States in the latter.…”
Section: Understanding Third Country Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations