1956
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1956.tb46040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Autonomic Responses: Toward a General Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
301
1

Year Published

1960
1960
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 566 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(9 reference statements)
7
301
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no premanipulation differences on the physiological measures; still, to eliminate the influence of initial levels of arousal on subsequent levels of arousal (i.e., the "law of initial values"; Lacey, 1956;Wilder, 1962), ANCOVAS were performed on each of the physiological measures, using the appropriate scores from the rest period as the measures of initial levels of arousal. The adjusted pulse rate, pulse volume, and skin resistance scores for each condition are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no premanipulation differences on the physiological measures; still, to eliminate the influence of initial levels of arousal on subsequent levels of arousal (i.e., the "law of initial values"; Lacey, 1956;Wilder, 1962), ANCOVAS were performed on each of the physiological measures, using the appropriate scores from the rest period as the measures of initial levels of arousal. The adjusted pulse rate, pulse volume, and skin resistance scores for each condition are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the HR CR has been shown in some cases to be at least partially determined by pre-CS baseline HR (Lacey, 1956), the HR CRs for each post-CS second were transformed by the method of Lacey into standard scores (M = SO, SD = 10) in which the regression of baseline HR on change from baseline scores has been removed. ANOVAs were thus recomputed on these corrected scores.…”
Section: Baseline Heart Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were averaged over trials, after the Snedecor test indicated such averaging to be justified, and modest support was revealed for the t=4.86,df=38,p< .001). In view of this, the heart period analyses were repeated using autonomic lability scores (Lacey, 1956) based upon r xy values computed for each trial across Ss. The interstimulus analysis yielded no significant effects.…”
Section: Observer Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%