1995
DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1995.113.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of bilingual programs in the Northern Territory, Australia, 1973–1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reviewing the available literature Hoff [22] recently argued that, given the obvious cultural, social, and economic benefits of bilingualism and the fact that many bilingual children begin school with levels of English proficiency that are an obstacle to academic achievement in standard educational programs, it is important that curricula and teaching practices are improved to meet the needs of children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Furthermore, the findings of earlier research (e.g., [23][24][25]) and more recent Australian [26,27] and international [28][29][30] reviews identify many benefits that well-designed bilingual instruction can deliver and, conversely, the many downsides associated with English only education policies. Indeed it has been argued that there has been too much focus on "deficits" and a failure to see children's ability to speak an Indigenous language as a strength rather than a deficit [31].…”
Section: Oral Storytelling Parent-child Bookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing the available literature Hoff [22] recently argued that, given the obvious cultural, social, and economic benefits of bilingualism and the fact that many bilingual children begin school with levels of English proficiency that are an obstacle to academic achievement in standard educational programs, it is important that curricula and teaching practices are improved to meet the needs of children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Furthermore, the findings of earlier research (e.g., [23][24][25]) and more recent Australian [26,27] and international [28][29][30] reviews identify many benefits that well-designed bilingual instruction can deliver and, conversely, the many downsides associated with English only education policies. Indeed it has been argued that there has been too much focus on "deficits" and a failure to see children's ability to speak an Indigenous language as a strength rather than a deficit [31].…”
Section: Oral Storytelling Parent-child Bookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these programs show very promising results in terms of children's academic achievement (see for instance Devlin, 1997Devlin, , 2005Gale, McClay, Christie, & Harris, 1981;Mohanty, 1990) when compared with the typical L2 submersion found in most regions in Australia, they are rare in Australia. Aboriginal education was an exception with dualliteracy education being implemented in some states, but these programs have had a chequered history (Molyneux, 2009).…”
Section: Transition Into the School Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2003;Collier & Thomas, 2002;McCarty, 2008;Tong et al, 2008;and Willig, 1985). Those overseas results were complemented by independent research conducted in the NT (e.g., Gale, McClay, Christie & Harris, 1981;Hill, 2008;Murtagh, 1979Murtagh, , 1982; official NT evaluation reports (e.g., Markwick-Smith, 1985;Richards, 1984;Richards & Thornton, 1981;Stuckey & Richards, 1982; see also Devlin, 1995); and an official statistical analysis of NT test results conducted over a four-year period (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004) as part of a departmental review of bilingual education (NT DEET, 2005). The NT Indigenous Education Strategic Plan for the 2006-2009 period drew on that analysis and noted that "The bilingual programs are effective overseas and give an indication of positive results in the Territory.…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 98%