2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(01)00787-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of quality of post-harvest oranges and apples by means of an electronic nose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several reports on electronic sensing in environmental control, medical diagnostics and the food industry (Keller et al 1995, Schaller et al 1998, Hai and Wang 2006. Some authors reported positive applications of EN technology for discriminating different fruits' quality and many experiments were performed including testing orange (Di Natale et al 2001a), melons (Benady et al 1995), blueberries (Simon et al 1996), pears (Oshita et al 2000, Correa et al 2001, peaches (Molto et al 1999, Brezmes et al 2000, Di-Natale et al 2001b, bananas , apples , Brezmes et al 2000, Saevels et al 2003 and nectarines (Di-Natale et al 2001b). These studies showed that EN has greater potential for nondestructive quality evaluation of mangoes, which emanate different strong aromatic compounds at different stages of maturity and ripening.…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Nmr) Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several reports on electronic sensing in environmental control, medical diagnostics and the food industry (Keller et al 1995, Schaller et al 1998, Hai and Wang 2006. Some authors reported positive applications of EN technology for discriminating different fruits' quality and many experiments were performed including testing orange (Di Natale et al 2001a), melons (Benady et al 1995), blueberries (Simon et al 1996), pears (Oshita et al 2000, Correa et al 2001, peaches (Molto et al 1999, Brezmes et al 2000, Di-Natale et al 2001b, bananas , apples , Brezmes et al 2000, Saevels et al 2003 and nectarines (Di-Natale et al 2001b). These studies showed that EN has greater potential for nondestructive quality evaluation of mangoes, which emanate different strong aromatic compounds at different stages of maturity and ripening.…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Nmr) Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of global aroma analysis by means of EN has been considered very promising during the last 15 years as a non-destructive tool to evaluate fruit quality, as shown in the comprehensive review of Peris and Escuder-Gilabert (2009), from different points of view: shelf-life investigation to assess "Jonagold" (Saevels et al, 2003) and "Pinklady" (Brezmes et al, 2001a) apples quality during shelf-life, to monitor tomato fruit with different storage time (Gómez et al, 2008); harvest date determinations in mandarins (Gomez et al, 2006), apples (Saevels et al, 2003) and mango fruit (Lebrun et al, 2008), to classify "Gala" apples at harvest in different maturity degrees (Pathange et al, 2006), faults detection as to detect freeze damage in oranges (Tan et al, 2005) or apples defects as mealiness and skin damage in "Cox" (di Natale et al, 2001) and "Red Delicious" apples (Li et al, 2007), and for blueberry fruit disease detection and classification (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Electronic Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, awareness about the food safety from the point of specific pathogenic bacteria has considered the need for a rapid and accurate detection system for microbial spoilage by checking the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) generated by these microorganisms [4]. The electronic nose (enose) is a system initially created to imitate the function of human nose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%