1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01536457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of the small-angle scattering of lamellar two-phase systems by means of interface distribution functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
271
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
271
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here λ is the wavelength of radiation, and 2θ is the scattering angle. In the historical context, the CDF is an extension to Ruland's interface distribution function (IDF) 41 to the multidimensional case or, in a different view, the Laplacian of Vonk's multidimensional correlation function. Further to the right, the top row shows the data recorded during the dynamic experiment.…”
Section: Saxs Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here λ is the wavelength of radiation, and 2θ is the scattering angle. In the historical context, the CDF is an extension to Ruland's interface distribution function (IDF) 41 to the multidimensional case or, in a different view, the Laplacian of Vonk's multidimensional correlation function. Further to the right, the top row shows the data recorded during the dynamic experiment.…”
Section: Saxs Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kxatky camera data were quantitatively evaluated using the method of interface distribution analysis (Ruland, 1977) and a generalized model for stacking statistics (Stribeck, 1993). After subtraction of the apparent background the measured intensity in absolute units, l~(s)/V, is transformed into an 'interference function', Gid(S), of the ideal two-phase system…”
Section: Evaluation Of Discrete Scattering Neglecting Void Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lorentz-corrected SAXS profile can be analyzed by onedimensional correlation function analysis (Goderis et al, 1999;Lee et al, , 2003Strobl & Schneider, 1980;Vonk & Kortleve, 1967) and/ or interface distribution function analysis (Ruland, 1977;Albrecht & Strobl, 1996;Verma et al, 1996;Santa Cruz et al, 1991;Xia et al, 2001) in order to determine the morphological parameters. Both of these approaches were considered for analyzing the SAXS data of our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%