2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of a key segment in the Europe–Adria collision: The Fruška Gora of northern Serbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
7
83
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The north-eastern area of Fruška Gora is characterized by the presence of transcurrently right faults where the distribution of local values of the stress field is controlled by the local fault structures. The significant displacement magnitudes and the significant strain parameters, obtained here, are correlated to the reactivated existing structures which have been recognised in earlier geological and geophysical studies (Marović et al, 2007;Matenco and Radivojević, 2012;Toljić et al, 2013). It is important to say that the geodetic methods of deformation analysis used here provide mainly geometric information about the changes having occurred, where the interpretation of results and identification of causal forces belongs to other kinds of research, such as neotectonic ones, so that geophysical.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The north-eastern area of Fruška Gora is characterized by the presence of transcurrently right faults where the distribution of local values of the stress field is controlled by the local fault structures. The significant displacement magnitudes and the significant strain parameters, obtained here, are correlated to the reactivated existing structures which have been recognised in earlier geological and geophysical studies (Marović et al, 2007;Matenco and Radivojević, 2012;Toljić et al, 2013). It is important to say that the geodetic methods of deformation analysis used here provide mainly geometric information about the changes having occurred, where the interpretation of results and identification of causal forces belongs to other kinds of research, such as neotectonic ones, so that geophysical.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The recent earthquake on the area of Italy is in favor of numerous studies asserting that the Adriatic Block appears as the main compression transmitter for the African and Eurasian tectonic plates, which to a large extent affects the tectonics of the Central European Region, especially that of the Pannonian Basin. In the Fruška Gora area, the exhumation of the metamorphic core of the mountains occurred along the major faults with E-W orientation (Toljić et al, 2013;Sušić et al, 2016). The present results are in favour of significant point displacements on the northwestern and northeastern slopes of Fruška Gora, which are detected by applying deformation analysis methods (CDA and robust methods).…”
Section: Geometric Deformation Analysis In Free Geodetic Network: Camentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The Middle Triassic onset of Neotethys opening was associated with intermediate and basic volcanism and the formation of the Adriatic passive continental margin [ Pamić , ; Schmid et al , ]. Transition from dominantly carbonatic Upper Triassic facies into more pelagic Middle Jurassic facies indicates a gradual deepening of the former Adriatic passive margin from the SW to NE in the present‐day geometry [e.g., Dimitrijević , ; Schefer et al , ; Toljić et al , ]. The subsequent early Middle Jurassic intraoceanic subduction [ Schmid et al , ] was followed by the Late Jurassic‐Earliest Cretaceous emplacement of ophiolites and associated Jurassic ophiolitic mélange during their obduction over the eastern Adriatic passive margin (i.e., the Western Vardar ophiolites) [ Dimitrijević , ; Karamata , ; Pamić , ; Babić et al , ; Schmid et al , ].…”
Section: The Tectonic Evolution Of Dinaridic‐alpine Transitional Areamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This was followed by emplacement of the fore‐arc region of the overriding lithosphere of the Vardar Ocean onto the Adria continental margin in the Early Cretaceous (∼130 Ma) [e.g., Schmid et al ., ]. Subsequent to their emplacement, the Adria continental domain including the passively overlying ophiolites became involved in collision with Eurasian continental units leading to nappe stacking and rethrusting of the ophiolites during the late Cretaceous and Paleogene [ van Hinsbergen et al ., ; Schmid et al ., ; Toljić et al ., ].…”
Section: Geology Of the Sampling Areamentioning
confidence: 99%