“…For example, in many cities around the world, the urban metabolism decision-making process still takes place in silos, where the policies of agriculture, water, waste, mobility, energy, health, telecommunications, education, etc., are considered separately by agencies, departments, divisions, cabinets, interdepartmental committees, municipal, regional, and state-owned utilities, and so on, neglecting a multidimensional and holistic perspective [194]. The balance of data and information governance between stakeholders operating within urban circularity, such as municipalities, research centers, universities, companies, citizens, nonprofit organizations, utilities, etc., represents a challenge for policymakers, urban planners, and managers [195]. In this regard, the literature on circular cities emphasizes participatory and fluid urban governance models capable of proactively involving stakeholders in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation circularity performance through continuous suggestions, feedback, proposals, ideas, and recommendations.…”