2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Damage Control Orthopedics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the acute management of bone fractures in trauma patients has evolved steadily, and there is an expanded indication for osteosynthesis, with the aim of early stabilization of the fractures. Depending upon the physiological condition of the patient, especially those with unstable polytrauma and significant lower extremity injuries, surgeons must choose the less aggressive external fixation first step for fracture stabilization (2). Once the adequate local wound debridement is ensured, which includes the removal of all dead and infected tissues and the stabilization of the systemic clinical condition of the patient, secondary major osteosynthesis is then performed with either plates and screws or intramedullary nails (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the acute management of bone fractures in trauma patients has evolved steadily, and there is an expanded indication for osteosynthesis, with the aim of early stabilization of the fractures. Depending upon the physiological condition of the patient, especially those with unstable polytrauma and significant lower extremity injuries, surgeons must choose the less aggressive external fixation first step for fracture stabilization (2). Once the adequate local wound debridement is ensured, which includes the removal of all dead and infected tissues and the stabilization of the systemic clinical condition of the patient, secondary major osteosynthesis is then performed with either plates and screws or intramedullary nails (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has evolved over the last few decades to better define the appropriate timing of definitive fixation for these patients [1][2][3][4]. Early findings support DCO in managing the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy [1,2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others purport a low rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with the infrequent use of DCO, suggesting damage control orthopaedics may result in an unnecessary delay of definitive fixation, as well as a longer hospital stay [3]. However, the consequence of implementing early total care in an inappropriate patient may result in ARDS, and potentially death, a far more grave result than unnecessary delays or longer hospital stays [4]. Although clinical situations for which immediate definitive fixation do exist in the poly-traumatized patient, multiple circumstances may point to DCO as the safest choice [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from such an approach were impressive resulting in decreased mortality [4]. Similarly the concept of damage control was extended to orthopedic and thoracic trauma surgery [7][8][9]. DCL was also not only being applied to trauma patients but its use was extended to emergency general surgery cases where the indications and outcomes were less clear [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%