2019
DOI: 10.3390/met9030292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Internal Damage Identified by Means of X-ray Computed Tomography in Two Steels and the Ensuing Relation with Gurson’s Numerical Modelling

Abstract: This paper analyzes the evolution of the internal damage in two types of steel that show different fracture behaviors, with one of them being the initial material used for manufacturing prestressing steel wires, and the other one being a standard steel used in reinforced concrete structures. The first of them shows a flat fracture surface perpendicular to the loading direction while the second one shows the typical cup-cone surface. 3 mm-diameter cylindrical specimens are tested with a tensile test carried out… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common approach for a parameter identification process is based on load-displacement data of notched tensile tests. Su arez et al show that the void evolution predicted in the simulation do not fitw e l l to the experimentally measured data obtained with CT investigations [187]. Load-displacement data does not have any information on the microstructure and, therefore, only characterize the damage-related softening and not the void evolution.…”
Section: Open Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most common approach for a parameter identification process is based on load-displacement data of notched tensile tests. Su arez et al show that the void evolution predicted in the simulation do not fitw e l l to the experimentally measured data obtained with CT investigations [187]. Load-displacement data does not have any information on the microstructure and, therefore, only characterize the damage-related softening and not the void evolution.…”
Section: Open Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%