The evolution of local participation and the mode of knowledge production in Arctic research

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Arctic science is often claimed to have been transformed by the increased involvement of local people, but these claims of a new research paradigm have not been empirically evaluated. We argue that the "new" participatory research paradigm emerging in Arctic science embodies many of the principles of the Mode 2 knowledge production framework. Using the Mode 2 thesis as an assessment framework, we examined research articles appearing between 1965 and 2010 in the journal Arctic to assess the extent to which there has been a paradigm shift toward more participatory approaches. Results suggest that the involvement of local people has increased only slightly over the last half century and continues to vary systematically among disciplines, organizations, and regions. Analysis of three additional journals focused on Arctic and circumpolar science establishes the generality of these slight increases in local involvement. There is clearly room for more community involvement in Arctic science, but achieving this will require either increasing the proportional representation of the organizations, disciplines, and regions with a track record of successful Mode 2 research, or encouraging Mode 2 research innovation within the organizations, disciplines, and regions currently predominated by Mode 1 approaches.

Climate change and Canada’s north coast: research trends, progress, and future directions

“…Collaboration among communities, policy makers, and researchers is essential to ensure that observations and models are informed by Indigenous and local knowledge, studies are oriented around planning and adaptation knowledge gaps, and research is effectively disseminated (Brunet et al 2014;Ford et al 2014;Savo et al 2016). Climate projections show that across northern Canada there will be shifting hazards for communities, with some communities facing substantial challenges in the coming century.…”

Identifying key needs for the integration of social–ecological outcomes in arctic wildlife monitoring

“…Local participation in research in the Arctic from 1965 to 2010 has only increased slightly (Brunet et al. ). Accordingly, within many arctic monitoring organizations and elsewhere, there are aims to increase local participation and use of local and indigenous knowledge (Mustonen & Ford ; Johnson et al.…”

“…In the Arctic, as elsewhere, monitoring approaches vary in motivations, degree, and characteristics of local participation and type of information produced (Brunet et al 2014). Approaches range from theoretical (contextindependent knowledge generation or evaluation of the influence of context) to applied science (knowledge built within the context in which it will be applied) (Brunet et al 2014). Modes of local participation and partnership include externally driven projects with data collection and use by scientists not usually residing in the Arctic; externally driven projects with local data collectors (sometimes included within the definition of community-based monitoring); locally driven projects with external advice and external analysis of information (community-based or community-driven monitoring); and locally driven projects with local analysis (Danielsen et al 2009;Kouril et al 2015).…”

“…Local participation can provide a mechanism for increased use of indigenous or local knowledge, although not all initiatives do so. Local participation in research in the Arctic from 1965 to 2010 has only increased slightly (Brunet et al 2014). Accordingly, within many arctic monitoring organizations and elsewhere, there are aims to increase local participation and use of local and indigenous knowledge (Mustonen & Ford 2013;Johnson et al 2015).…”

Towards a Theory of Change for Community-based Research Projects

“…As with all research, community-based research extends knowledge through disciplinary/interdisciplinary inquiry or systematic investigations. Within community-based research, knowledge is co-produced, as both community members and researchers are engaged in designing and conducting research for knowledge generation (Brunet et al, 2014;Hall, 2011;Stoecker and Tryon, 2009). Yet community-based research also functions to activate knowledge for use within society.…”