1984
DOI: 10.2307/413800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Noun Incorporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
214
1
21

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
214
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Baker (1988Baker ( , especially 92-105, 1996 described stranding of a similar kind in noun incorporation and used this as an argument for syntactic movement and incorporation in the syntax. This approach violates the Lexical Integrity Principle, and analyses more in keeping with this Principle are suggested in Mithun (1984Mithun ( , 1986 and Anderson (2005). However, Baker's syntactic approach is not easily compatible with the derivational morphology illustrated in (2), and there are other problems with the approaches of Mithun and Anderson. In this paper I argue that, while words are formed in the morphology, under some circumstances parts of words are accessible to (parts of) the syntax, contrary to the Lexical Integrity Principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baker (1988Baker ( , especially 92-105, 1996 described stranding of a similar kind in noun incorporation and used this as an argument for syntactic movement and incorporation in the syntax. This approach violates the Lexical Integrity Principle, and analyses more in keeping with this Principle are suggested in Mithun (1984Mithun ( , 1986 and Anderson (2005). However, Baker's syntactic approach is not easily compatible with the derivational morphology illustrated in (2), and there are other problems with the approaches of Mithun and Anderson. In this paper I argue that, while words are formed in the morphology, under some circumstances parts of words are accessible to (parts of) the syntax, contrary to the Lexical Integrity Principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mithun (1984) presents a large typological study of NI types and argues that verbs with incorporated nouns (INs) are compounds. She particularly notes that in general left-hand constituents of such compounds do not refer, do not introduce discourse referents, and are not marked for definiteness or number (1984: 849).…”
Section: Stranded Modifiers and Null Heads In Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muchos han sido los trabajos centrados en la INCORPORACIÓN NOMI-NAL en general, donde Mithun (1984), Baker (1988) y Hale & Keyser (1993) son algunos ejemplos representativos. Mientras que un tratamiento exhaustivo de este fenómeno está fuera del alcance del presente estudio, sí se tratará en tanto en cuanto es un ejemplo de mecanismo no completamente productivo que modifica la valencia verbal reduciendo el número de argumentos asociados a la base mayormente en el plano sintáctico, ya que la reducción de valencia por incorporación nominal no resulta en una modificación de la denotación verbal, como se verá en este apartado.…”
Section: La Incorporación En Términos Generalesunclassified
“…Though the syntactic relevance of the incorporated nominal has lately been called into question for other languages (Mithun 1984), the facts of West Greenlandic still compel a syntactic analysis (Sadock to appear b).…”
Section: A Treatment Of West Greenlandic Noun Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%