2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of small molecular acceptors for organic solar cells: Advances, challenges and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported widely, intramolecular weak non-covalent interactions could improve molecular planarity through partly "locking" the s-bonds, which has been veried by theoretical calculations and single crystal X-ray diffraction. [17][18][19][20][21] In practice, however, there is inadequate time for molecules to rearrange during the fast lm preparation step of the solution procedure. This may result in fairly different nal molecular conformations from those of theoretical simulations or slow solvent volatilization/exchange in single crystal cultivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported widely, intramolecular weak non-covalent interactions could improve molecular planarity through partly "locking" the s-bonds, which has been veried by theoretical calculations and single crystal X-ray diffraction. [17][18][19][20][21] In practice, however, there is inadequate time for molecules to rearrange during the fast lm preparation step of the solution procedure. This may result in fairly different nal molecular conformations from those of theoretical simulations or slow solvent volatilization/exchange in single crystal cultivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a wide variety of NFA materials, including perylene diimide (PDI), naphthalene diimide (NDI), diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP), indacenodithiophene (IDT) and benzothiadiazole (Y6) based small molecular acceptors (SMAs), that exhibit improved power conversion efficiency (PCE) over the fullerene materials have been developed [9]. A champion device efficiency narrowing 18% PCE has been achieved in a single junction device using a Y6 derivative [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A champion device efficiency narrowing 18% PCE has been achieved in a single junction device using a Y6 derivative [10]. Among the multitude of investigated NFA materials, the acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) type based on an IDT core has gradually emerged as an efficient material, contributing to a remarkable enhancement of the efficiency of BHJs up to 13% [11] (a broad list of small molecular acceptors along with their photovoltaic properties appears in a very recent review [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15–20 ] The efficient PSCs employ the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) thin film which is made of polymer or small molecule as a donor (p‐type semiconductor) and a fullerene derivative [ 21 , 22 ] or a NFSM as an acceptor (n‐type semiconductor). [ 23–30 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] The efficient PSCs employ the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) thin film which is made of polymer or small molecule as a donor (p-type semiconductor) and a fullerene derivative [21,22] or a NFSM as an acceptor (n-type semiconductor). [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In most cases, the efficient BHJ-PSCs use the narrow bandgap NFSMAs, Scheme 1. Synthetic plan of P128 and P129.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%