2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation in galaxies of different morphological types

Abstract: Aims. By means of chemical evolution models for ellipticals, spirals, and irregular galaxies, we aim at investigating the physical meaning and the redshift evolution of the mass-metallicity relation, as well as how this relation is connected with galaxy morphology. Methods. Our models distinguish among different morphological types through the use of different infall, outflow, and star formation prescriptions. We assume that galaxy morphologies do not change with cosmic time. We present a method accounting for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
154
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
7
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without energy injection from supernovae to regulate the star formation, gas that remains in galaxies rapidly cools, forms stars, and increases its metallicity too early, producing a M − Z relation too flat compared to observations. However, Calura et al (2009) reproduced the M − Z relation with chemical evolution models for ellipticals, spirals and irregular galaxies, by means of an increasing efficiency of star formation with mass in galaxies of all morphological types, without the need for outflows favoring the loss of metals in the less massive galaxies. A recent study that supports this result for massive galaxies is that of Vale Asari et al (2009), modelling the time evolution of stellar metallicity using a closed-box chemical evolution model.…”
Section: Effect Of the Mass And Luminosity-metallicity Relationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Without energy injection from supernovae to regulate the star formation, gas that remains in galaxies rapidly cools, forms stars, and increases its metallicity too early, producing a M − Z relation too flat compared to observations. However, Calura et al (2009) reproduced the M − Z relation with chemical evolution models for ellipticals, spirals and irregular galaxies, by means of an increasing efficiency of star formation with mass in galaxies of all morphological types, without the need for outflows favoring the loss of metals in the less massive galaxies. A recent study that supports this result for massive galaxies is that of Vale Asari et al (2009), modelling the time evolution of stellar metallicity using a closed-box chemical evolution model.…”
Section: Effect Of the Mass And Luminosity-metallicity Relationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Besides, less efficient star formation in low-mass galaxies could also cause the lower chemical enrichment of smaller galaxies and explain the origin of the MZR (e.g. Brooks et al 2007; Mouhcine et al 2008;Calura et al 2009). The evolution of the MZR could also be affected by the different SF histories associated with galaxies with different morphologies (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the MZR could also be affected by the different SF histories associated with galaxies with different morphologies (see e.g. Calura et al 2009). In addition, the infall of metal-poor gas on to the outer parts of galaxies or inflows triggered by mergers with other systems could play an important role (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is the correlation between the metallicity and kinematics (Wolfe & Prochaska 1998;Ledoux et al 2006;Prochaska, Hennawi, & Herbert-Fort 2008;Neeleman et al 2013), which is largely due to the underlying massmetallicity relation that has been well-established in galaxies at high and low redshifts (Tremonti et al 2004;Savaglio et al 2005;Erb et al 2006;Maiolino et al 2008;Møller et al 2013;Neeleman et al 2013). The correlations between metallicity and other fundamental parameters such as stellar mass and star formation rate are key to understanding various galaxy populations (Calura et al 2009;Mannucci et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%