2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of the UV-to-mm extragalactic background light: evidence for a top-heavy initial mass function?

Abstract: We present predictions for the UV-to-mm extragalactic background light (EBL) from a recent version of the galform semi-analytical model of galaxy formation which invokes a top-heavy stellar initial mass function (IMF) for galaxies undergoing dynamically-triggered bursts of star formation. We combine galform with the grasil radiative transfer code for computing fully self-consistent UV-to-mm spectral energy distributions for each simulated galaxy, accounting for the absorption and reemission of stellar radiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(220 reference statements)
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also no bright sources (> 4 mJy) in E at > 0.5. Our number counts derived for E are in agreement with those presented by Wang et al (2019); Cowley et al (2019).…”
Section: Model Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are also no bright sources (> 4 mJy) in E at > 0.5. Our number counts derived for E are in agreement with those presented by Wang et al (2019); Cowley et al (2019).…”
Section: Model Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…S 's level of agreement is unprecedented from cosmological hydrodynamic simulations (for a review, see Casey et al 2014). For comparison, we also show the results from the E simulation (McAlpine et al 2019), which illustrates that E does not come as close to matching the 850 µm number counts (see also Wang et al 2019;Cowley et al 2019). In particular, E does not produce any bright (> 4 mJy) sources at > 0.5.…”
Section: Integrated Number Countssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is not necessarily surprising given the discrepancy in the predicted number counts of EAGLE and observations in the FIR bands (e.g. Cowley et al 2019;Wang et al 2019).…”
Section: The Final Ebl and Comparison To Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%