1995
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.16.7.561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Urban Spatial Structure in the Open Area of Southeastern Coastal China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through spatial superposition analysis, we propose a spatial distribution structure of population with the aggregated areas of population and GDP are shown in Figure 5. By referring to various standards for the identification of urban agglomerations at home and abroad [37][38][39][40], such as the indicators of number of cities, population size, per capita GDP, and the level of urbanization which are differential in different research and thinking, and combining the characteristics of this study, the identification criteria for aggregated areas of population and GDP are determined as follows: (1) the population density from high to low of the county-level administrative districts reveals a cumulative percentage of land area less than 12%, a cumulative percentage of population less than 60% and a cumulative percentage of GDP less than 76%; (2) the number of county-level administrative districts is greater than or equal to 3; and (3) the county-level administrative districts are contiguous. Based on the above principles, the key areas for the future development of urbanization in China are proposed following the spatial distribution structure of population of "1 + 4 + 11" pattern: 1 nationally aggregated area of population and GDP, 4 regionally aggregated areas of population and GDP, and 11 local regionally aggregated areas of population and GDP.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Structure Of Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through spatial superposition analysis, we propose a spatial distribution structure of population with the aggregated areas of population and GDP are shown in Figure 5. By referring to various standards for the identification of urban agglomerations at home and abroad [37][38][39][40], such as the indicators of number of cities, population size, per capita GDP, and the level of urbanization which are differential in different research and thinking, and combining the characteristics of this study, the identification criteria for aggregated areas of population and GDP are determined as follows: (1) the population density from high to low of the county-level administrative districts reveals a cumulative percentage of land area less than 12%, a cumulative percentage of population less than 60% and a cumulative percentage of GDP less than 76%; (2) the number of county-level administrative districts is greater than or equal to 3; and (3) the county-level administrative districts are contiguous. Based on the above principles, the key areas for the future development of urbanization in China are proposed following the spatial distribution structure of population of "1 + 4 + 11" pattern: 1 nationally aggregated area of population and GDP, 4 regionally aggregated areas of population and GDP, and 11 local regionally aggregated areas of population and GDP.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Structure Of Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through spatial superposition and cluster analysis, the aggregated areas of population and economic production are shown in Figure 5. By referring to various standards for the identification of urban agglomerations at home and abroad [29][30][31][32] and combining the characteristics of this study, the identification criteria for aggregated areas of population and GDP were determined as follows: (1) the population density from high to low of county-level administrative districts revealed a cumulative percentage of land area less than 11.57%, a cumulative percentage of population less than 60.06% and a cumulative percentage of GDP less than 75.66%; (2) the number of county-level administrative districts was greater than or equal to 3; and (3) the county-level administrative districts were contiguous. Based on the above principles, the key areas for the future development of urbanization in China were proposed following the pattern of "1+4+11": one nationally aggregated area of population and economic production, 4 regionally aggregated areas of population and economic production and 11 local regionally aggregated areas of population and economic production.…”
Section: Population Pattern Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research into urban fragmentation in China has focused on megacities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou Gao et al, 2014;Kuang et al, 2014;Li et al, 2013;Schneider et al, 2005;You, 2016aYou, , 2016bYu & Ng, 2007;Yue et al, 2013) and key regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the Pearl River Delta as a whole (Lin, 2001;Tan et al, 2005;Yao & Liu, 1995). Urban fragmentation in China's island cities per se has not been a focus of study, with just a few exceptions (e.g., Su, 2017;Hong, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%