1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00957.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolutionary Strategy of the Equidae and the Origins of Rumen and Cecal Digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
159
1
11

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
159
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The abomasum and intestine are closely related, as are the stomach and intestine in nonruminants, and the rumen is closely related to the abomasum and intestine as well as the reticulum and omasum. These results, plus previous reviews that suggest that foregut evolution is evolutionarily easy [12], indicate an early foregut evolutionary event stemming from the intestine and later development of compartments stemming from a subsequently evolved rumen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The abomasum and intestine are closely related, as are the stomach and intestine in nonruminants, and the rumen is closely related to the abomasum and intestine as well as the reticulum and omasum. These results, plus previous reviews that suggest that foregut evolution is evolutionarily easy [12], indicate an early foregut evolutionary event stemming from the intestine and later development of compartments stemming from a subsequently evolved rumen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Horses are hindgut fermenters, adapted to grazing continually on marginal forages that change seasonally, thus slowly [1]. The hindgut (caecum and colon) comprises roughly two thirds of the volume of the equine digestive tract [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From allometric trends in metabolic rates, smaller ruminants are expected to have higher dietary requirements, and hence higher faecal nutrient thresholds for tissue maintenance, than larger‐bodied species. Nonruminants have higher rates of digestive passage than ruminants of similar body size, and hence are able to tolerate higher indigestible fibre and correspondingly lower nutrient concentrations in the food they ingest than ruminants (Janis, ; Duncan et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%