2016
DOI: 10.16949/turcomat.37361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Level of Proficiency in Technopedagogical Education

Abstract: Bu çalışmanın amacı ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının Teknopedagojik eğitim yeterliklerinin ve performans göstergelerinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarının sayılar ve işlemler, cebir, geometri ve ölçme, veri işleme ve olasılık öğrenme alanlarında GeoGebra, Cabri3D ve Tinkerplots gibi farklı dinamik matematik yazılımları kullanılarak hazırlanılan teknoloji destekli ders anlatımları incelenmiştir. 2013-2014 güz ve bahar yarıyıllarında Karadeniz Bölgesi'nde bir devlet üniversitesinde ilköğ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technologysupported teaching process completed within the LBD framework was observed to have a positive effect on the points obtained by pre-service teachers from the TPACK scale. This situation is parallel to the results of many studies completed previously by different researchers (Agyei & Voogt, 2012;Aygün et al, 2016;Bahçekapılı, 2011;Cavin, 2007;Chai, Koh & Tsai, 2010;Erdoğan, 2014;Figg & Jaipal, 2009;Kafyulilo et al, 2015;Karataş et al, 2016;Koh & Divaharan, 2011;Koh & Chai, 2014;Kurt et al, 2013;Maeng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This technologysupported teaching process completed within the LBD framework was observed to have a positive effect on the points obtained by pre-service teachers from the TPACK scale. This situation is parallel to the results of many studies completed previously by different researchers (Agyei & Voogt, 2012;Aygün et al, 2016;Bahçekapılı, 2011;Cavin, 2007;Chai, Koh & Tsai, 2010;Erdoğan, 2014;Figg & Jaipal, 2009;Kafyulilo et al, 2015;Karataş et al, 2016;Koh & Divaharan, 2011;Koh & Chai, 2014;Kurt et al, 2013;Maeng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%