1957
DOI: 10.3233/isp-1957-43501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The excess resistance of a ship in rough seas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maruo [1] derived the formula for the added resistance ( R ) but the analysis using the stationary-phase method was complicated. Kashiwagi [4] showed a simpler analysis by use of Parseval's theorem in the Fourier transform, and by extending the analysis, he also derived the formulae for the steady sway force ( Y ) and yaw moment ( N).…”
Section: Calculation Formulae For Wave-induced Steady Forces and Yaw mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maruo [1] derived the formula for the added resistance ( R ) but the analysis using the stationary-phase method was complicated. Kashiwagi [4] showed a simpler analysis by use of Parseval's theorem in the Fourier transform, and by extending the analysis, he also derived the formulae for the steady sway force ( Y ) and yaw moment ( N).…”
Section: Calculation Formulae For Wave-induced Steady Forces and Yaw mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early development of the theoretical formulation for the added resistance was provided by Maruo [1] by means of the principles of momentum and energy conservation. In the calculation formula derived, the Kochin function, equivalent to the amplitude of ship-generated disturbance waves far from the ship, is needed as the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quasi-linear free surface condition ( 4 ) is used in the near field and the simplified one, the classical free surface condition ( 5 ) , is used in the far field. The hull surface condition for the near field potential can also be linearized consistently based on the double-body flow as follows ( 6 ) where 7z, represents the displacement of the ship oscillation in direction j, 7), represents the derivative of nj, with respect to time, and the n-vector and m-vector are given by ( 7 ) The solutions of the near and far fields are matched on the control surface. The matching condition is naturally the continuity of the potential and its gradients ( 8 ) By applying 3-D panel method, the far field solution can be expressed by ( 9 ) in which the line-integral has been neglected, the superscript means the terms in the far field, and G* is the potential of three dimensional unsteady wave source, which satisfies the free surface condition ( 5 ) and the radiation condition.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can be classified into two main categories as far-field and near field methods. The far-field methods, introduced by Maruo (1957), are based on the energy and momentum conservation principles, where the added resistance is obtained by calculating the total rate of change in momentum flux at infinity. The near field method first introduced by Boese (1970) on the other hand uses direct hydrodynamic pressure integration over the wetted surface of the ship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%