2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20200501.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Experience of Saudi Students with Online Learning in U.S. Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar perception [10] was seen by Saudi students in an online questionnaire where they preferred the on ground more than the online education due to quality and accreditation . [11] Our results regarding the learning outcomes can be interpreted in two ways; viewing the students' feedback, cheating & malpractices were common in the online format which could be a reason for better performance seen in the online assessment in both Biochemistry and Physiology as is agreed upon by majority of the faculty . Although we used preventive [14] t e c h n i q u e s l i k e o n e a t t e m p t a l l o w e d , randomizing questions, reshuffling of options, limited time given to minimize the digital cheating, still MCQs are considered the easiest online format for cheating with lack of online proctoring, hence we are now moving towards a balanced assessment strategy by adding open book exam to promote deeper learning of higher level learning outcome, in the medium stake assessments .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Similar perception [10] was seen by Saudi students in an online questionnaire where they preferred the on ground more than the online education due to quality and accreditation . [11] Our results regarding the learning outcomes can be interpreted in two ways; viewing the students' feedback, cheating & malpractices were common in the online format which could be a reason for better performance seen in the online assessment in both Biochemistry and Physiology as is agreed upon by majority of the faculty . Although we used preventive [14] t e c h n i q u e s l i k e o n e a t t e m p t a l l o w e d , randomizing questions, reshuffling of options, limited time given to minimize the digital cheating, still MCQs are considered the easiest online format for cheating with lack of online proctoring, hence we are now moving towards a balanced assessment strategy by adding open book exam to promote deeper learning of higher level learning outcome, in the medium stake assessments .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Using modern technology in the educational context has actually changed learning. From research, the most agreed upon guidelines are communication evolution, collaborative learning, expanding audience, multitasking, random access to information, rapid access to information, and image versus text information combination (Alashwal, 2020). In the research conducted by Popovici and Mironov (2015), students were certain about the individualized aspect of e-learning, its collaborative character as well as the high-level of independence offered by e-learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, studies have been published investigating student expectations and perceptions regarding elearning (Popovici & Mironov, 2015). Alashwal's (2020) study shows an increase in demand and growing acceptance of online learning. According to Alashwal, students involved in e-learning programs are generally positive about their experiences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%