1984
DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(84)90010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of self-awareness and its relation to level of self-consciousness: An experiential sampling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human self-focus, it is generally agreed, has both a public and a private dimension (e.g., Buss, 1980;Davis & Franzoi, 1999;Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975;Franzoi & Brewer, 1984). Public self-focus is characterized by attentiveness to those features of one's self that are presented to others (e.g., physical features and mannerisms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Human self-focus, it is generally agreed, has both a public and a private dimension (e.g., Buss, 1980;Davis & Franzoi, 1999;Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975;Franzoi & Brewer, 1984). Public self-focus is characterized by attentiveness to those features of one's self that are presented to others (e.g., physical features and mannerisms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical research devoted to self-consciousness suggests that private and public self-consciousness are two independent dimensions that operate as important mediating variables. These exert similar effects as private and public self-awareness on different occasions, such as in the engagement of public or private self-consciousness during the day (Franzoi & Brewer, 1984); in the correlation with social or personal identity (Cheek & Briggs, 1982); in the correlation with 'suggestibility' (Scheier ef al., 1979); in the exhibition of the 'reactance' effect (Carver & Scheier,198 1); in the 'dissonance' phenomena (Davis, 1984;Scheier & Carver, 1980); in self-schema articulation (Mueller, Thompson & Dugan, 1986;Nasby, 1989Nasby, , 1985Turner, 1978a); in predictive validity of self-reports (Franzoi, 1983;Turner, 1978b); in accessibility of 'physical attractiveness schema' (Turner,Gilliland & Klein,198 1); in recall of self-reference tasks (Agatstein & Buchanan, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulating these instruments were shown to have different effects on self-awareness: whereas mirror manipulations heightened the S's attention to internal states or private aspects of self such as thoughts, feelings, motives; audience, T.V. camera, tape recorder m~ipulations were found to heighten the s's attention toward his/her public aspects of self, such as one's social and physical appearance (Baldwin & Holmes, 1987;Carver & Scheier, 1981;Franzoi & Brewer, 1984;Froming, Walker & Lopyan, 1982;Scheier & Carver, 1977, 1980Scheier, Buss & Buss, 1978;Scheier, Carver & Gibbons, 1979). Fenigstein, Scheier and Buss (1975) emphasized an individual difference suggesting that one may have a dispositional tendency to maintain self-awareness which has been conceptualized as 'self-consciousness'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative and significant relationship is found between individual's self-reflections and psychological wellbeing, whereas a positive and insignificant relationship is found between internal state awareness and psychological wellbeing (Harrington & Loffredo, 2007). The time spent on public or private selfconsciousness is not found to be associated with behaviour (Franzoi & Brewer, 1984). Public SC is found to be higher in social anxious individuals (George & Stopa, 2008).…”
Section: Iii)mentioning
confidence: 79%