The proletarianisation of the professions arguments claim that salaried employment compromises the professional status of employees. Much of the literature on salaried professionalism claims that the integration of professionals into bureaucracies is problematic because professionals identify with their profession rather than the employing organisation. It is argued that since professionals control their own certification and performance standards and have separate sources of legitimacy within their professions, the move to employee status is problematic. The ultimate conflict within these organisations is between the autonomy of professionals and the control of administrators. The more recent human organisation literature challenges this argument by demonstrating that professional behaviour is shifting toward a type of group orientation in which the organisational and personal/professional loyalties are more likely to coincide. The dynamics of professional bureaucracies have changed as more and more of the traditionally free professionals, such as doctors and lawyers, make a permanent move to employee status.
With a goal of improving the development and delivery of effective online information literacy resources, the purpose of this study was to look at how program level and the timing of the introduction of a Literature Review library guide within the program influenced online business student perceived value of the resource. A population of undergraduate business students (N=355) and online MBA students (N=319) were introduced to a Literature Review library guide during specific points in their programs. Students were asked to complete an online survey that included 17 closed-ended items designed to measure perceived usefulness, satisfaction and likeliness to use the guide again. The survey also included two open-ended questions asking students to discuss those elements of the guide they found most valuable and whether they wanted any additional features included in the guide. The data collection strategy required faculty post information about the Literature Review library guide and the survey in their courses at two specified times in the course. A low response rate (3.5%) may have resulted from inconsistencies in how faculty shared information about the guide and the study in their courses. Although the small sample size (n=24) limited the planned analysis, and results indicated no statistical significance between groups, descriptive findings were reported, and trends were used to revise the resource and inform future development of library research guides. Overall, students reported being satisfied with the resource and found it usable. Graduate students were more likely to report elements of the guide that supported effective search and evaluation strategies were valuable; whereas, undergraduate students tended to value the links to writing resources. Student feedback also suggested that the earlier the guide was introduced in the program, the more likely students would use the resource. Adopting a model that embeds resource guides early in academic programs and aligns guide content with the curriculum should lead to increased use of the resource.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.