2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10687-012-0148-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extremal index for GARCH(1, 1) processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the GARCH(1, 1) process, Laurini and Tawn (2012) provided an expression for the spectral measure, for a different description of the angular variable to that used here. For the choice of the angular variable (2.8), for all t, their result translates to…”
Section: Basrakmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the GARCH(1, 1) process, Laurini and Tawn (2012) provided an expression for the spectral measure, for a different description of the angular variable to that used here. For the choice of the angular variable (2.8), for all t, their result translates to…”
Section: Basrakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing theoretical and computational methods for deriving extremal properties are well established for special cases of the GARCH(p, q) process, namely: for symmetric Z t with p = 0, q = 1, corresponding to the ARCH(1) process (de Haan et al, 1989) and for p = q = 1, corresponding to a GARCH(1,1) (Laurini and Tawn, 2012); and for asymmetric Z t with p = q = 1 (Ehlert et al, 2015). Additional results of other tails probabilities are derived in the two-dimensional case by Collamore et al (2014) but are effective only for ARCH(1) as further complications arise for the GARCH(1, 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2 we find the proportions of anti-D (3) (u n ) to anti-D (5) (u n ) of a GARCH(1,1) process with Gaussian innovations, autoregressive parameter λ = 0.25 and variance parameter β = 0.7 (Laurini and Tawn, [16] 2012). More precisely, in the first two panels are plotted the proportions of anti-D (3) (u n ) by choosing k n = [(log n) 3 ] and k n = [(log n) 3.3 ], respectively, and the last two plots correspond to the proportions of anti-D (4) (u n ) and anti-D (5) (u n ), with k n = [(log n) 3.3 ].…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is illustrated in Sections 4 and 5. A nice illustration of this feature arises in time series: a Gaussian autoregressive process has temporal dependence as measured by the autocorrelation function but no tail dependence as measured by χ (Sibuya, 1960); whereas the reverse holds for the ARCH and GARCH processes (de Haan and Resnick (1989), Laurini and Tawn (2012)).…”
Section: Different Dependence Measures For Typical and Extreme Value mentioning
confidence: 99%