2020
DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FAIR Data Maturity Model: An Approach to Harmonise FAIR Assessments

Abstract: In the past years, many methodologies and tools have been developed to assess the FAIRness of research data. These different methodologies and tools have been based on various interpretations of the FAIR principles, which makes comparison of the results of the assessments difficult. The work in the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group reported here has delivered a set of indicators with priorities and guidelines that provide a 'lingua franca' that can be used to make the results of the assessment using t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) Guiding Principles (Wilkinson et al, 2016) are fundamental to machine-enabled data sharing. Furthermore, the FAIR Data Maturity Indicators (DMI) endorsed by the Research Data Alliance (RDA) (Bahim et al, 2020) provides implementation guidance on what indicators to assess for "FAIR-ness". The TRUST (Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability, Technology) principles (Lin et al, 2020) describe sustainability and data stewardship requirements for repositories for long term FAIRness (collected together at Core Trust Sealhttp://www.coretrustseal.org).…”
Section: Rationale For Making a Stewardship Maturity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) Guiding Principles (Wilkinson et al, 2016) are fundamental to machine-enabled data sharing. Furthermore, the FAIR Data Maturity Indicators (DMI) endorsed by the Research Data Alliance (RDA) (Bahim et al, 2020) provides implementation guidance on what indicators to assess for "FAIR-ness". The TRUST (Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability, Technology) principles (Lin et al, 2020) describe sustainability and data stewardship requirements for repositories for long term FAIRness (collected together at Core Trust Sealhttp://www.coretrustseal.org).…”
Section: Rationale For Making a Stewardship Maturity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAIR Data Maturity Model [24] which was developed and is maintained by the RDA community [25] provides a set of compliance indicators to assess the level of implementation of the FAIR principles and can be used for defining policy, research and infrastructure related competences in Data Stewardship and data management.…”
Section: Go Fair Metadata Management Requirements and Fair Data Maturity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, to date, much of existing work on FAIR assessment focuses on what needs to be measured, which led to the development of indicators (also called metrics or criteria) elaborating the principles; e.g., Research Data Alliance (RDA) FAIR Data Maturity Model. 7 One of the open questions around the FAIR assessment has been how to measure the FAIRness of the scientific data in practice. 4 Several manual assessment tools (as provided in the section ''related work'') have been piloted but are primarily intended to engage and educate research communities to make their data FAIR.…”
Section: Introduction Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, to date, much of existing work on FAIR assessment focuses on what needs to be measured, which led to the development of indicators (also called metrics or criteria) elaborating the principles; e.g., Research Data Alliance (RDA) FAIR Data Maturity Model. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation