2019
DOI: 10.2478/nor-2019-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fall of the Queen of Nordic Skiing: A comparative analysis of the Swedish and Norwegian media coverage of the Therese Johaug scandal

Abstract: In 2016, Norwegian cross-country skier Therese Johaug made her positive doping test public. We compare how the Norwegian and Swedish media covered the ensuing scandal with the aim of discovering how constructions of subjectivity, national identity, anti-doping policy and the role of cross-country skiing are interrelated. Drawing on a critical discourse analytical research design, we identify significant differences: the Norwegian media hesitated to call it a doping scandal and occasionally portrayed Johaug as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We abstained from consulting external expertise as a stage of our review (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005), instead we utilized our diverse and interdisciplinary backgrounds and our experiences with DA (Sveinson and Allison, 2022; Sveinson et al, 2021; Wagner and Kristiansen, 2019; Wagner and Pedersen, 2014). Below, we focus on methods and analytical strategies employed.…”
Section: Analyzing and Summarizing The Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We abstained from consulting external expertise as a stage of our review (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005), instead we utilized our diverse and interdisciplinary backgrounds and our experiences with DA (Sveinson and Allison, 2022; Sveinson et al, 2021; Wagner and Kristiansen, 2019; Wagner and Pedersen, 2014). Below, we focus on methods and analytical strategies employed.…”
Section: Analyzing and Summarizing The Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short of two weeks later, another piece of major sports news broke as the celebrated Norwegian cross-country skier Therese Johaug was charged for use of banned substances, in the form of medication for sunburned lips. The story was covered massively across national media, with a live press conference, extensive commentaries, and investigative reporting in Norway and internationally to uncover timelines, causalities, blame, and consequences for the athlete, for Norwegian sports and for national pride and identity (Wagner and Kristiansen 2019). Figure 1 illustrates the amount of coverage of the two stories, and their different lifespan: The build-up to the Oct 1st boxing match, followed by a dip on the Sunday, and then the commentaries on Monday (Oct 3rd), which constitutes a peak that slowly fades out.…”
Section: Case: Political Interpretations and Temporal Dimensions Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She stated that the positive test result arose from the lip balm but, regardless, she was banned from sport competition for 13 months before the period of ineligibility was even extended. 12 Moreover, athletes that tested positive for doping agents often assert their innocence and claim an unintended use or a third-party administration. For example, a group of Olympic athletes was tested positive for the clostebol main metabolite after either using Trofodermin ® ointment themselves or, in some occasions, athletes stated that they only applied the ointment to a teammate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her team doctor prescribed the used lip‐balm to Johaug. She stated that the positive test result arose from the lip balm but, regardless, she was banned from sport competition for 13 months before the period of ineligibility was even extended 12 . Moreover, athletes that tested positive for doping agents often assert their innocence and claim an unintended use or a third‐party administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%