2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feasibility and concurrent validity of performing the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd Edition via telerehabilitation technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study used Pearson correlations to evaluate the concurrent validity between the MOT 4–6 and the KTK, with results showing moderate correlations for children aged 5–6 (mean r = .63), as was hypothesised prior to testing ( r >.6). In addition to the results detailed in Table 6 , one study looked at the concurrent validity of assessing children using the MABC in person and via tele-rehabilitation software, with results showing no significant difference between scores, as hypothesised [ 76 ]. As well as this, the MABC and the BOT-SF had a positive predictive value of .88, with twenty one out of twenty four children testing positively for motor coordination problems also scoring below the fifteenth percentile on the MABC [ 90 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study used Pearson correlations to evaluate the concurrent validity between the MOT 4–6 and the KTK, with results showing moderate correlations for children aged 5–6 (mean r = .63), as was hypothesised prior to testing ( r >.6). In addition to the results detailed in Table 6 , one study looked at the concurrent validity of assessing children using the MABC in person and via tele-rehabilitation software, with results showing no significant difference between scores, as hypothesised [ 76 ]. As well as this, the MABC and the BOT-SF had a positive predictive value of .88, with twenty one out of twenty four children testing positively for motor coordination problems also scoring below the fifteenth percentile on the MABC [ 90 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Continued) evaluating the validity and reliability of FMS assessment tools were conducted in 29 countries, with Australia hosting the most studies(13) [50,56,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77], followed by Brazil (12 studies)[53,57,66,70,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] and the USA (nine studies). Eight studies were carried out in Belgium[49,58,63,[86][87][88][89] and seven in Canada[43,54,60,[90][91][92][93][94].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions are ongoing about how to use visual observation to deliver remote assessment of wheelchair and seating needs (Graham et al, 2019), supervise administration of standardized measures such as the Movement Assessment Battery for Children by community workers (Nicola et al, 2018), and supplement information from a family reported questionnaire such as the GMFCS Family Report Questionnaire to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (Rackauskaite et al, 2012).…”
Section: Viewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple tools have been deemed reliable and valid in TR physical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders ( Mani, et al, 2017 ); however, there is less research available for TR in the pediatric population. Some outcome measures are validated in pediatric TR such as the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4 th edition) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating for Pediatric Language Assessment ( Taylor et al, 2014 ) or the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (2 nd edition) for motor performance ( Nicola, et al, 2018 ); however, these tests are not able to detect change across the entire rehabilitation discipline such as the COPM. While there is much to be learned regarding pediatric TR, this quality improvement initiative supported further use and study of the COPM as a family-centered outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%