2023
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3244563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility of An Automatical Facial Evaluation System Providing Objective and Reliable Results for Facial Palsy

Abstract: Facial palsy would lead to a series of physical and mental problems, as facial function plays an important role in various aspects of daily life. However, the current strategies for evaluating facial function relied heavily on raters and the results varied from the experience of raters. Thus, an objective and accurate facial evaluation system is always claimed. In this study, a customized automatical facial evaluation system (AFES) was proposed, which might have the potential to be employed as an adjunctive an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was not considered to be user-friendly due to its lack of real-time functionality. In another study by Zhang et al [30] a system that automatically evaluates faces called AFES (Automatic Facial Evaluation System) was suggested with customization options; during the study, a total of 92 individuals with facial palsy were enrolled and underwent evaluations. The evaluations included both subjective manual assessments using scales such as mHBGS and mSFGS, as well as automatic objective evaluations utilizing AFES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was not considered to be user-friendly due to its lack of real-time functionality. In another study by Zhang et al [30] a system that automatically evaluates faces called AFES (Automatic Facial Evaluation System) was suggested with customization options; during the study, a total of 92 individuals with facial palsy were enrolled and underwent evaluations. The evaluations included both subjective manual assessments using scales such as mHBGS and mSFGS, as well as automatic objective evaluations utilizing AFES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%