2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-s2-s2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FEATURE framework for protein function annotation: modeling new functions, improving performance, and extending to novel applications

Abstract: Structural genomics efforts contribute new protein structures that often lack significant sequence and fold similarity to known proteins. Traditional sequence and structure-based methods may not be sufficient to annotate the molecular functions of these structures. Techniques that combine structural and functional modeling can be valuable for functional annotation. FEATURE is a flexible framework for modeling and recognition of functional sites in macromolecular structures. Here, we present an overview of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…97 They found numerous PROSITE patterns with common three-dimensional structure characteristics which could be used to create templates defining 3D functional patterns. Wu et al 98 recently improved on a previous study 99 showing that 3D information is significantly more relevant than PROSITE patterns. Our work suggests that common and distinct characteristics can be associated with a given pattern and that distinct patterns share common local features.…”
Section: Prosite Patternsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…97 They found numerous PROSITE patterns with common three-dimensional structure characteristics which could be used to create templates defining 3D functional patterns. Wu et al 98 recently improved on a previous study 99 showing that 3D information is significantly more relevant than PROSITE patterns. Our work suggests that common and distinct characteristics can be associated with a given pattern and that distinct patterns share common local features.…”
Section: Prosite Patternsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Next, the algorithm checks whether the increase is "large enough, " i.e., greater than or equal to δ (line 11). If so, the set of SDPs and the sets of not-yet-covered structures are updated (line [13][14]. If not, the algorithm terminates and returns the set of SDPs.…”
Section: Structure-guided Selection Of Specificity Determining Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common way to perform such a search is to identify patterns specific from a given function for example and to design a prediction method. Information taken into account can consist in different levels: only sequence (Ansari & Raghave, 2010;Sigrist et al, 2010), sequence and structure (Halperin et al, 2008;Pugalenthi et al, 2008), only structure (Manikandan et al, 2008;Polacco & Babbitt, 2006) or use of more general classifications: GO (Espadaler et al, 2006), SCOP (Tendulkar et al, 2010) ... In this section, the objective is to design a prediction method only based on AA sequence in order to provide information for only sequenced proteins.…”
Section: Using Hmm To Detect Interesting Hmm-sa Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%