2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(02)01404-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ferrimagnetic structure of Fe2Mo3O12: dependence of Fe–O–O–Fe supersuperexchange couplings on geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic structures of more such network structures need to be determined in order to elucidate the magnetic interactions and to allow for an explanation of the rather high magnetic ordering temperature in the light of the long Fe-Fe distances. The results support the relevance of long-range magnetic exchange interactions mediated by AgO-polyhedra as already previously concluded for NaO-polyhedra in closely related compounds [2,18]. The three times higher temperature of the maximum in the temperature dependence of magnetization M(T) for a-AgFe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 (21.5 K) in comparison with isostructural a-NaFe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 (7 K) gives evidence for a stronger coupling effect by Ag ions than via Na ions.…”
Section: F/afsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetic structures of more such network structures need to be determined in order to elucidate the magnetic interactions and to allow for an explanation of the rather high magnetic ordering temperature in the light of the long Fe-Fe distances. The results support the relevance of long-range magnetic exchange interactions mediated by AgO-polyhedra as already previously concluded for NaO-polyhedra in closely related compounds [2,18]. The three times higher temperature of the maximum in the temperature dependence of magnetization M(T) for a-AgFe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 (21.5 K) in comparison with isostructural a-NaFe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 (7 K) gives evidence for a stronger coupling effect by Ag ions than via Na ions.…”
Section: F/afsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This empirical rule has been observed for numerous supersuperexchange couplings, e.g. between Mn 2þ ions in MnWO 4 [15] and a-MnMoO 4 [16], Cu 2þ ions in CuMoO 4 -III [17] and Fe 3þ ions in Fe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 [18]. In all these cases, the superexchange couplings are not the dominant magnetic interactions, but those supersuperexchange couplings with the largest angles.…”
Section: F/afmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This material also exhibits interesting magnetic properties, i.e. ferromagnetic structure and dominant antiferromagnetic supersuperexchange coupling along the Fe-O-O-Fe paths [9] and the ability to reversibly insert lithium ions, reported for the first time by J. B. Goodenough in the bulk material [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, they are called double tungstates and the general formula NaFe x Cr 1Àx (WO 4 ) 2 includes both end-members and their solid solution. This system provides a suitable test for the proposed dominance of supersuperexchange couplings Fe-O-O-Fe, with Fe-O-O and O-O-Fe angles close to 1801 and both bridging oxygens belonging to the same coordination polyhedra of a diamagnetic ion [3]. However, in NaFe x Cr 1Àx (WO 4 ) 2 the layers of magnetic ions parallel to the bc-plane are separated from each other by nearly 10 Å .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%