“…According to the EPHPP quality assessment tool, [13] 1 study was of high methodological quality, [27] 8 studies were of moderate quality, [17,18,21–25,28,29] and 2 studies were of low methodological quality. [15,26] The global rating “weak” for study quality was due to lack of information about subject inclusion, study withdrawals, and dropouts. To ascertain vital status, studies used death registries (n = 5), [17,22,24,26,29] medical records (n = 3), [18,21,27,28] the combination of medical records and death registries (n = 2), [15,25] and the combination of interviews, medical records, and a death register (n = 1).…”