2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-014-9607-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The finishing stage in swine production: influences of feed composition on carbon footprint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impacts were calculated at the farm gate and the functional unit considered was 1 kg of body weight gain (BWG) over the nursery stage. The starting pig production system considered was a conventional nursery farm with indoor rearing of castrated males on partially slated floor, where manure was kept in a pit under the slats during 24 h and scraped daily (during the morning) into open slurry tanks without a natural crust cover (Cherubini et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Article Of Piglets Piglets Nutrition and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Impacts were calculated at the farm gate and the functional unit considered was 1 kg of body weight gain (BWG) over the nursery stage. The starting pig production system considered was a conventional nursery farm with indoor rearing of castrated males on partially slated floor, where manure was kept in a pit under the slats during 24 h and scraped daily (during the morning) into open slurry tanks without a natural crust cover (Cherubini et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Article Of Piglets Piglets Nutrition and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that soybean was produced in southern Brazil, the second largest soybean producer in the country (CONAB, 2016). However, to perform the calculations for global warming potential (GWP) and cumulative energy demand (CED), the most affected categories by soybean origin (Monteiro et al, 2016), we hypothesized that 98 % of soybean comes mainly from the central-western Brazil, as proposed by Cherubini et al (2015). Life cycle inventory for maize and soybean came from Alvarenga et al (2012) and Silva et al (2010), respectively.…”
Section: Crop Production and Non-plant Feed Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The GWP of the finishing stage in swine production under four scenarios of dietary CP (18, 16, 15 and 13%) was calculated by CHERUBINI et al (2015b). In the evaluation of feed composition, CP18 (no soybean hulls or maize starch) showed the best environmental performance for GWP.…”
Section: Nutrition and Global Warming Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%