2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-016-9832-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The finite basis problem for infinite involution semigroups of triangular 2  $$\times $$ ×  2 matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We establish two sufficient conditions under which an involution monoid is nonfinitely based. By applying one of the sufficient conditions to the involution semigroups (T 2 (F), * ), (UT 2 (F), * ) and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ), we show that (T 2 (F), * ) and (UT 2 (F), * ) are nonfinitely based when char(F) 0, and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ) is nonfinitely based for any field F. Together with the results of [24], this shows that (T 2 (F), * ), (UT 2 (F), * ) and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ) are nonfinitely based for any field F.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We establish two sufficient conditions under which an involution monoid is nonfinitely based. By applying one of the sufficient conditions to the involution semigroups (T 2 (F), * ), (UT 2 (F), * ) and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ), we show that (T 2 (F), * ) and (UT 2 (F), * ) are nonfinitely based when char(F) 0, and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ) is nonfinitely based for any field F. Together with the results of [24], this shows that (T 2 (F), * ), (UT 2 (F), * ) and (UT ±1 2 (F), * ) are nonfinitely based for any field F.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Note that (UT 2 (F), * ) is an involution submonoid of (T 2 (F), * ). If char(F) = p, then the result follows from Lemma 4.4 and Theorem 4.9; if char(F) = 0, then the result follows from [24,Corollary 14]. Therefore, Theorem 4.13 is still true if we substitute the field F by an arbitrary associative ring R with a unit element 1 satisfying either ( †) or ( ‡).…”
Section: Nonfinitely Based Involution Semigroups Of Triangular Matricesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, if S is a commutative semiring into which the semiring of natural numbers can be embedded, then for n > 1 the monoid of all n × n (upper triangular) matrices over S satisfies no non-trivial identities, since the free monoid of rank 2 embeds into all such semigroups (see [19] for example). The finite basis problem is increasingly studied for families of infinite semigroups of combinatorial interest for which identities are known to exist, with complete results available for one-relator semigroups [14] and Kauffman monoids [2], and several recent partial results for various semigroups of upper triangular matrices with restrictions on the size of the matrices and the entries permitted on the diagonals [6,7,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if S is a commutative semiring into which the semiring of natural numbers can be embedded, then for n > 1 the monoid of all n×n (upper triangular) matrices over S satisfies no non-trivial identities, since the free monoid of rank 2 embeds into all such semigroups (see [15] for example). The finite basis problem is increasingly studied for families of infinite semigroups of combinatorial interest for which identities are known to exist, with complete results available for one-relator semigroups [10] and Kauffman monoids [1], and several recent partial results for various semigroups of upper triangular matrices with restrictions on the size of the matrices and the entries permitted on the diagonals [3,4,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%