2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16874-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
397
0
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 727 publications
(420 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
397
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Veerstek & Malalasekera [38] and Moukalled, Margani & Darwish [46], y + values in a range of (11.06 to 12.00) have important effects to turbulence production near the wall. As shown in the graph of Figure 6, the u velocity with respect to the mesh degree (by number of elements) stops varying from the FINE mesh degree.…”
Section: Mesh Selection and Sensibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Veerstek & Malalasekera [38] and Moukalled, Margani & Darwish [46], y + values in a range of (11.06 to 12.00) have important effects to turbulence production near the wall. As shown in the graph of Figure 6, the u velocity with respect to the mesh degree (by number of elements) stops varying from the FINE mesh degree.…”
Section: Mesh Selection and Sensibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the mean values in the discrete control volumes are derived by applying the midpoint rule for numerical integration such that their approximation is second-order accurate. Therefore, the nodal values should ideally represent values at the centroid of the surrounding discrete control volume (Blazek, 2005;Moukalled et al, 2016). In that regard, a cell-centered finite difference scheme is thus more accurate than a vertex-centered finite difference scheme.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Nodal Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, in cell-centered finite difference schemes the nodal values always correspond to the centroids of the cell whereas in vertex-centered finite difference schemes nodes and centroids (of the dual cells) do not coincide at model boundaries and in model regions where the primary grid is not uniform. It is well known that this mismatch between nodes and centroids can lead to inaccuracies since the mean values within affected discrete volumes are not computed by a midpoint rule (Blazek, 2005;Moukalled et al, 2016).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Nodal Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3-dimensional assembly model was created in Autodesk Inventor professional and geometry was simplified with respect to functional design of the device. The Finite Volume Method is a numerical technique that transforms the partial differential equations representing conservation laws over differential volumes into discrete algebraic equations over finite volumes [17]. Ansys meshing was used to discretize 3 solid bodies.…”
Section: Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%