2008
DOI: 10.1787/9789264039551-5-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finnish approach to system leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main problem is among young, less experienced teachers, who have been working just 1-5 years (Guarino et al, 2006;Ingersoll, 2001;2003, 20). This "leakage" of beginning teachers is seen also in Finland, even thought the status of teachers and education has been considered to be very high (Hargreaves, Halász & Pont, 2008;Webb, Vulliamy, Hämäläinen, Kimonen & Nevalainen, 2004).…”
Section: Turnovermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main problem is among young, less experienced teachers, who have been working just 1-5 years (Guarino et al, 2006;Ingersoll, 2001;2003, 20). This "leakage" of beginning teachers is seen also in Finland, even thought the status of teachers and education has been considered to be very high (Hargreaves, Halász & Pont, 2008;Webb, Vulliamy, Hämäläinen, Kimonen & Nevalainen, 2004).…”
Section: Turnovermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Frameworks for professional development are inevitably values-based and echoing Hargreaves (2014), the overarching research question for the literature review that informed this framework had explicit normative assumptions around moral purpose and democratic process that challenged narrow conceptions of marketization in education. The question was 'If, as a professional community, we believe that education should be a public service in a democratic society, what sort of system leaders do we want in the future?…”
Section: Developing the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They regularly utilized their external networks and resources to assist in realizing their vision for the school. Hallinger and Heck (1998) [27] noted that higher achieving schools actively encouraged collaborative decision [29]. These leaders spent more time in schools with children and placed more focus on improving student welfare and attainment through involvement with partners in their wider community including sports clubs, businesses, and religious groups (Pricewaterhouse Coopers, 2007) [30].…”
Section: External Awareness and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%