2015
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3797-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finslerian compact star model

Abstract: We construct a toy model for compact stars based on the Finslerian structure of spacetime. By assuming a particular mass function, we find an exact solution of the FinslerEinstein field equations with an anisotropic matter distribution. The solutions are revealed to be physically interesting and pertinent for the explanation of compact stars.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface density is in the order of 10 14 g cm −3 and the redshift is in the range 0.364-0.515. This range is close to the values found by Böhmer and Harko [27], Rahaman et al [28,29] and Kileba Matondo et al [25]. Also, we could mention that the required upper bound of Buchdahl [20] which is equivalent to Z s ≤ 2 for a realistic star has been fulfilled.…”
Section: Physical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The surface density is in the order of 10 14 g cm −3 and the redshift is in the range 0.364-0.515. This range is close to the values found by Böhmer and Harko [27], Rahaman et al [28,29] and Kileba Matondo et al [25]. Also, we could mention that the required upper bound of Buchdahl [20] which is equivalent to Z s ≤ 2 for a realistic star has been fulfilled.…”
Section: Physical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The surface density is approximately in the order of 10 14 g cm −3 and the gravitational redshift is in a realistic range (0.4274 ± 0.1492) − (0.518 ± 0.1172). This range is still close to the values found by Böhmer and Harko [45], Rahaman et al [46,47] and Kileba Matondo et al [43]. The value of the stellar radius R is the range of (9.68 ± 0.12) − (10.49 ± 0.19) km, and the mass in the range of (1.63 ± 0.07) − (2.13 ± 0.03) M .…”
Section: Physical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In a more general context, there are considered nonlinear and linear connection structures, nonholonomic constraints and generalized symmetries, which are different from those in (pseudo) Riemannian geometry. approaches on Finsler gravity theories and attempts to construct physical models and find approximate solutions can be studied in [25,39,40,53,66,67,[84][85][86][87][88][98][99][100]111,112,126,[136][137][138][139]141]. It is considered that readers are familiar with standard results on mathematical relativity, geometry of (non)linear connections in fiber bundles, spinor differential geometry, and exact classical solutions in GR (see, for instance, [48,82,104,213]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%