The First Five Years of Urban Strategic Planning in Russia under Federal Law (2014–2019)

Жихаревич, Б. С.; Pribyshin, Taras

doi:10.1134/s2079970520020161

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Метод: экспертная оценка на основе изучения текстов стратегий и описание нескольких кейсов лучшей практики. [Климанов, Будаева, Чернышова, 2017;Budaeva, Klimanov, 2016;Будаева, 2017], а в части муниципальных стратегий -Б. Жихаревич и Т. Прибышин [Жихаревич, Прибышин, 2013;Zhikharevich, Pribyshin, 2020].…”

Section: постановка задачи актуальностьunclassified

Risks and Threats in Russian Regional Strategies

Жихаревич¹

2020

Reg. ekon. Yug Ross.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the results of the Russian experience of the inclusion of risks and threats in regional strategies of social and economic development. The official documents of 85 strategies were analyzed, the quality of risks and risk assessment was expertly assessed at a five-point scale. A ranked number of strategies was made taking into account an additional parameter, i.e. the number of references to the word “risk”. A list of the best strategies was made. They are the strategies of Sakhalin, Kurgan, Novosibirsk, Ivanovo regions, Zabaykalsky krai, and Republic of Crimea. The author notes that in most strategies of the Russian regions, attention is paid to risks and threats, but only in a third of strategies they are analyzed relatively well, and measures to deal with risks have been developed in no more than 10% of strategies. An abnormally large number of references to the word “risk” were identified when they are described in relation to all projects (Arkhangelsk region) or events (Zabaykalsky krai). The methodological problems associated with the analysis of risks and threats were systematized. They are a mixture of the concepts of problem, weakness, threat, risk, negative factor; lack of assessments of the likelihood and strength of the impact of risks; lack of description of measures to reduce the consequences of risks. The absence of a correlation between the quality of work with risks and threats and the regional resilience index characterizing the region’s resistance to economic and financial crises was found. The author notes that the regions that are aware of their vulnerability work better than other ones which mentioned threats and risks in their strategies, but this circumstance has little effect on their shock resistance against economic crises. The recommendations concerning the improvement of strategic planning are suggested. They are a thorough analysis of threats and weaknesses at the stage of a SWOT analysis, identification of a separate section on strategic risks, and development of an appropriate set of adaptive scenarios, creation of a regional risk management system.

show abstract

Section: постановка задачи актуальностьunclassified