2021
DOI: 10.3897/asp.79.e65325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first molecular insight into the genus Turanium Baeckmann, 1922 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Callidiini) with a description of a new species from Middle Asia

Abstract: This paper sheds the first light on the phylogeny of the Central Asian genus Turanium Baeckmann, 1922. By applying an integrative taxonomy approach, we revealed and described a new species from Kyrgyzstan—Turanium losi Karpiński, Plewa & Hilszczański sp. nov. Distinguishing characters from closely related Turanium pilosum (Reitter, 1891) are presented and their ecological associations are discussed. The key characters, including the male terminalia, were examined by means of scanning electron microscop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutanen et al, 2012; Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007, 2013). A similar COI sequence distance (2.6%) occurs between Turanium pilosum (Reitter, 1891) and Turanium losi Karpiński, Plewa & Hilszczański, 2021 (Karpiński, Szczepański, et al, 2021). On the other hand, Lukhtanov et al (2016) claimed that a difference in at least 3% may be a conservative indication of separate species, though they admit that other authors use a lower threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Mutanen et al, 2012; Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007, 2013). A similar COI sequence distance (2.6%) occurs between Turanium pilosum (Reitter, 1891) and Turanium losi Karpiński, Plewa & Hilszczański, 2021 (Karpiński, Szczepański, et al, 2021). On the other hand, Lukhtanov et al (2016) claimed that a difference in at least 3% may be a conservative indication of separate species, though they admit that other authors use a lower threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This method can serve automatic species identification by matching new sequences to existing taxa in reference libraries, differentiating closely related or sibling species, and associating different life stages and dimorphic sexes, e.g., refs. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, there are some insect groups and situations where the use of this method may be seriously limited, e.g., hybridising species or maternally-inherited endosymbionts [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused by the fact that classical morphological taxonomy does not always adequately reflect the phylogenetic relationships between taxa due to numerous cases of parallel evolution, coevolution, homoplasia, etc. The rise of the new molecular system of the longhorn beetles occurs at different levels, starting with the species (Torres-Vila & Bonal, 2019;Zamoroka et al, 2019;Kajtoch et al, 2022) and genera (Kim et al, 2018;Karpiński et al, 2021), and ending with revision of higher taxa: tribes (Dascălu et al, 2021;Sutherland et al, 2021;Zamoroka, 2021), subfamilies (de Santana Souza et al, 2020;Lee & Lee, 2020) and the entire family (Nie et al, 2020). The solution to the problem of misinterpretations of phylogenetic relationships should be found by consensus of molecular methods and morphological data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%