1994
DOI: 10.1086/418431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fitness of Fitness Concepts and the Description of Natural Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of any set of adaptations in a given environmentwhether morphological, physiological, or life history traits-are best evaluated by examining both performance and fitness (Endler 1986;Arnold & Wade 1984a,b;Kozlowski 1993). Short-term fitness components such as growth rate, energy balance, reproductive output per season, mortality rate, and lifetime egg/offspring production are common measures of performance (often referred to as fitness) (Thoday 1953, McGraw & Caswell 1996; for mussels, see Bierne et al 2006, Shields et al 2008, but population-level responses can be assessed only when all such response variables are incorporated into a multigeneration measure of fitness based on growth, reproduction, and survivorship (de Jong 1994). To this end, researchers have used a combination of empirical measurements and mathematical models to generate comparative measures of population growth rate (i.e., r or λ, where r = lnλ) (Metz et al 1992, McGraw & Caswell 1996 as an estimation of individual (Darwinian) fitness.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of any set of adaptations in a given environmentwhether morphological, physiological, or life history traits-are best evaluated by examining both performance and fitness (Endler 1986;Arnold & Wade 1984a,b;Kozlowski 1993). Short-term fitness components such as growth rate, energy balance, reproductive output per season, mortality rate, and lifetime egg/offspring production are common measures of performance (often referred to as fitness) (Thoday 1953, McGraw & Caswell 1996; for mussels, see Bierne et al 2006, Shields et al 2008, but population-level responses can be assessed only when all such response variables are incorporated into a multigeneration measure of fitness based on growth, reproduction, and survivorship (de Jong 1994). To this end, researchers have used a combination of empirical measurements and mathematical models to generate comparative measures of population growth rate (i.e., r or λ, where r = lnλ) (Metz et al 1992, McGraw & Caswell 1996 as an estimation of individual (Darwinian) fitness.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection gradients at the phenotypic level are not necessarily equal to gradients at the genetic level (Rausher, 1992); they may differ due to strong selection and non-linear fitnesses (De Jong, 1994a). Also, the phenotypic gradient may be a poor predictor of selection at the genetic level, if the genetic or environmental component of the phenotype is correlated with fitness rather than the phenotype itself; this can be checked by comparing selection at the phenotypic and genetic level (Rausher, 1992;Van Tienderen & De Jong, 1994).…”
Section: (Ii) Selection Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the concept of fitness explicitly links the environment, organisms, and traits to the evolutionary process, and thus serves as a central, unifying concept in biology ( de Jong 1994;McGraw and Caswell 1996;Brommer et al 2002;Link et al 2002). Fitness has been variously defined, but most authors consider it to be a demographic concept, and use quantities such as intrinsic rate of natural increase, r, and net reproductive rate, R 0 , to quantify fitness (Partridge and Harvey 1988;de Jong 1994). These fitness measures use age-specific lifehistory data, and provide an estimate of fitness for a group of organisms but do not consider the fitness of individuals that compose the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironically, it is the individual that is born, that survives, matures, reproduces, and dies. Consequently, most empirical studies apply the concept of individual fitness by measuring survival and fecundity of individuals (Clutton-Brock 1988;de Jong 1994). The concept of individual fitness can provide valuable insights into the pattern and strength of natural selection (McGraw and Caswell 1996;Käär and Jokela 1998;Link et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%