1963
DOI: 10.1017/s0368393100078846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Flow and Pressure Losses in Smooth Pipe Bends of Constant Cross Section

Abstract: SummaryIncompressible turbulent flow in smooth pipe bends of circular-arc curvature and constant cross section is discussed. The effects of bend angle, radius ratio, duct cross-sectional shape and Reynolds number are considered. Particular attention is paid to the influence of the tangents on the flow and losses in a bend. In addition consideration is given to the definition and measurement of the bend loss.A correlation of experimental pressure loss data is made. It is shown that large variations in experimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of tangent pipes (straight sections of pipe upstream and downstream of the bend) on the pressure loss through pipe bends was studied by Ward, 11 who compared the value of resistance coefficient as the downstream pressure measurement location was varied. There have been various publications focused on the swirl intensity and the swirl switching phenomena in the downstream tangent of a pipe bend, e.g., those by Sudo et al ., 12 Sakaibara and Sonope, 13 Hellstrom et al ., 14 and Kim et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of tangent pipes (straight sections of pipe upstream and downstream of the bend) on the pressure loss through pipe bends was studied by Ward, 11 who compared the value of resistance coefficient as the downstream pressure measurement location was varied. There have been various publications focused on the swirl intensity and the swirl switching phenomena in the downstream tangent of a pipe bend, e.g., those by Sudo et al ., 12 Sakaibara and Sonope, 13 Hellstrom et al ., 14 and Kim et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%