2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flow distribution in the parallel tubes of the cavity receiver under variable heat flux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matched MBLs yield almost identical classical size effects due to boundary scattering on pore edges, regardless of the pore shapes. 36,37 The computational domain is divided into many spatial bins called "subcells" to statistically determine the local electron states such as the carrier concentration. In simulations, the subcells are usually in rectangular shapes to fit the square-shaped pores and computational domain.…”
Section: Overview Of the Electron MC Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matched MBLs yield almost identical classical size effects due to boundary scattering on pore edges, regardless of the pore shapes. 36,37 The computational domain is divided into many spatial bins called "subcells" to statistically determine the local electron states such as the carrier concentration. In simulations, the subcells are usually in rectangular shapes to fit the square-shaped pores and computational domain.…”
Section: Overview Of the Electron MC Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling water of the cooler is from the tap water tank by use of an additional circulation system, which consisted of a cooling pump, a cooler, a cooling tower, and a cooling water tank. The experimental data obtained in Hao et al 21 are compared with numerical simulation results obtained under different total flow rate, pressure, and heat flux distribution. It can be observed in Figure 6 that most of the relative errors of flow fall between −15% and +15%, which represent the upper and lower bounds of the errors excepting for the results of Tube 1.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data obtained in Hao et al 21 are compared with numerical simulation results obtained under different total flow rate, pressure, and heat flux distribution. It can be observed in Figure 6 that most of the relative errors of flow fall between −15% and +15%, which represent the upper and lower bounds of the errors excepting for the results of Tube 1.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of key geometric parameters such as collector diameter and number of tubes on the flow field distribution was investigated, considering the influence of geometric parameters on the flow field distribution. Hao et al (2016) analyzed the effects of heat flow density ratio, total flow rate, and system pressure on the flow distribution in parallel tubes. The results showed that the flow distribution became significantly worse with the increase of heat flow density and concentration ratio; the flow distribution was improved with the decrease of system pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%