1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00682008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flux-flow hall effect in type II superconductors. An explanation of the sign reversal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We will follow the approach developed in [15] where it was proposed that the imaginary part of the relaxation Then the δn contribution to the Hall conductivity in Eq. (9) coincides with the result of [13,14] if the numerical parameter β (−α 2 in notation of [13]) is equal to 1, which corresponds to the value of the TDGL parameter u ≪ 1 [14]. For large values of u the analysis of [13,14] gives a similar result but with an additional coefficient of the order of unity in front of the 'δn' term.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We will follow the approach developed in [15] where it was proposed that the imaginary part of the relaxation Then the δn contribution to the Hall conductivity in Eq. (9) coincides with the result of [13,14] if the numerical parameter β (−α 2 in notation of [13]) is equal to 1, which corresponds to the value of the TDGL parameter u ≪ 1 [14]. For large values of u the analysis of [13,14] gives a similar result but with an additional coefficient of the order of unity in front of the 'δn' term.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…We will show now that the δn term in the conductvity we found is just the term which was obtained in Time Dependent Ginzburg Landau (TDGL) model [13,14]. We will follow the approach developed in [15] where it was proposed that the imaginary part of the relaxation Then the δn contribution to the Hall conductivity in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Matsuda et al [48] and Nagaoka et al [49] have experimentally suggested that the sign of ρ xy depends on the doping level in most cuprate superconductors; i.e., a sign reversal occurs in an underdoped regime but diminishes in overdoped ones. Kopnin et al [50] and Dorsey [51] have also discussed the Hall anomaly based on a microscopic approach and proposed theories of a mixed-state Hall effect based on a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model; they postulate that the sign reversal depends on the gradient of the density of states at the Fermi surface. According to these experimental and theoretical results, researching the doping concentration dependence may provide a definitive conclusion on the Hall sign reversal in high-J c BaFe 2 As 2 :Co epitaxial films because this study employed a slightly overdoped sample.…”
Section: This Model Explains Well the Observation That The (T H) Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentally observed dependence of the Hall conductivity on magnetic field [35,36] also confirms our results (eq. 19),where a term independent on magnetic field is added in contrast to the previous theories [37,38]. Without any special assumption about pinning strength or fluctuations as was made by Wang et al [39] the theoretical curves qualitatively explain experimental results of the Hall effect of superconductors in the mixed state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%