1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9192(95)00026-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The food-first bias and nutrition policy: lessons from Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main barriers our informants find themselves navigating and addressing are the familiar political economy themes of donors overstepping their mark, line ministries and development actors operating in silos, controversies about the appropriate roles for the private sector; and further issues specific to nutrition, including overcoming the 'food-first bias' in public policy (Pelletier et al, 1995); a lack of local level knowledge, evidence and data to inform policy, programming and advocacy; and the fragmentation of the community in some contexts unable to focus around a coherent set of goals. This set of findings speak clearly to perspectives that see leadership as a continual political process (Leftwich and Wheeler, 2011) and lends support to conclusions of earlier exercises of the need for consensus building and strategic capacity across the nutrition field (Hoey and Pelletier, 2011;Pelletier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Summary Of Findings and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main barriers our informants find themselves navigating and addressing are the familiar political economy themes of donors overstepping their mark, line ministries and development actors operating in silos, controversies about the appropriate roles for the private sector; and further issues specific to nutrition, including overcoming the 'food-first bias' in public policy (Pelletier et al, 1995); a lack of local level knowledge, evidence and data to inform policy, programming and advocacy; and the fragmentation of the community in some contexts unable to focus around a coherent set of goals. This set of findings speak clearly to perspectives that see leadership as a continual political process (Leftwich and Wheeler, 2011) and lends support to conclusions of earlier exercises of the need for consensus building and strategic capacity across the nutrition field (Hoey and Pelletier, 2011;Pelletier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Summary Of Findings and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these relative advantages, the anemia prevalence of women and children still mirrored national anemia levels in these groups (Ministry of Public Health et al 2005). As has been shown in other studies, improved socioeconomic status is not a guarantee of nutritional well-being (Assefa et al 2001;Mason 2002;Pelletier 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Second, specific factors that impair food, health, and care are contextual: they can and do differ widely across countries, districts, and communities, depending on agroecological, infrastructural, economic, and sociocultural conditions (Pelletier et al 1995). For that reason, capacities must be developed for decentralized assessment, planning, and implementation, in addition to national policy development.…”
Section: Multisectoral Nutrition Systems: the Basic Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%