2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of Neoarchean continental crust in the south-east Superior Craton by two distinct geodynamic processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) It is likely that the S1 feature is caused by the delamination and sinking of the lower crust into the mantle and the middle crust dimmed reflection zones, M1 and M2, were caused by intrusions from the partial melting of the S1 feature. This interpretation is compatible with the finding of a recent geochemical study that portraits a continental‐rift setting, driven by early plume magmatism in the central Abitibi (Mole et al., 2021). (b) It could also represent a deeper segment of the PDF that was preserved below the Moho.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(a) It is likely that the S1 feature is caused by the delamination and sinking of the lower crust into the mantle and the middle crust dimmed reflection zones, M1 and M2, were caused by intrusions from the partial melting of the S1 feature. This interpretation is compatible with the finding of a recent geochemical study that portraits a continental‐rift setting, driven by early plume magmatism in the central Abitibi (Mole et al., 2021). (b) It could also represent a deeper segment of the PDF that was preserved below the Moho.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The geodynamic evolution of the Archean crust, including the Abitibi Subprovince, remains controversial. The main geodynamic models include: (1) subduction and accretion of associated volcanic arcs Ludden and Hubert 1986;Kimura et al 1993;Calvert et al 1995;Calvert and Ludden 1999;Wyman et al 2002), as was suggested for the Chibougamau area D r a f t (Polat et al 2018); (2) mantle plume-driven crustal reworking activity with associated arc-type volcanism (Rey et al 2003;Gerya et al 2015), which could be followed by subduction (Ayer et al 2002;Wyman et al 2002); (3) delamination, including aspects of a subcretion model, implying horizontal movements followed by the imbrication of a crust that is too thick to subduct (Bédard et al 2003;Bédard et al 2013;Bédard 2018) and; (4) rifting of a cratonic nucleus (Mathieu et al 2020b;Mole et al 2021), to produce a 30-40 km thick mafic crust by the partial melting of a hot ambient mantle (Herzberg et al 2010); however, the study of Roman and Arndt (2020) show that such a process is not plausible on Earth. Hypothetical models (3) and ( 4) consider that partial melting occurred at the base of the thickened crust (Van Kranendonk et al 2015).…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Arc-like geochemical signatures are common in the Abitibi (Ayer et al, 2002) but do not prove that volcanic arcs and subduction zones existed, as there could have been a number of different ways to produce the observed signatures (Pearce, 2008;Bédard et al, 2013;Mole et al, 2021). Because Archean rocks are not as depleted as modern volcanic rocks, many argue that modern plate tectonic processes could not have been the cause of negative Nb-Ta anomalies and high Th concentrations (Bédard et al, 2013;Thurston, 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Archean Felsic Volcanic Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Archean rocks are not as depleted as modern volcanic rocks, many argue that modern plate tectonic processes could not have been the cause of negative Nb-Ta anomalies and high Th concentrations (Bédard et al, 2013;Thurston, 2015). A number of alternative models of Archean greenstone belt evolution have been suggested that could account for the differences (e.g., dome-and-keel and mantle wind models: Sawyer et al, 1994;Bédard et al, 2013;Thurston, 2015;Mole et al, 2021). Some have suggested that crustal contamination created the arc-like signatures, which is consistent with the Th enrichment identified in the random forest classification and with evidence of older crust beneath the Abitibi greenstone belt (e.g., Mole et al, 2021).…”
Section: Comparison With Archean Felsic Volcanic Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%