2000
DOI: 10.1071/it00031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fossil record of Mesozoic and Tertiary Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera : Polyphaga)

Abstract: Lack of characters, similarity of stem species of adelphotaxa and the necessity to know the extant world fauna of the studied group of fossils are the main difficulties in palaeontology of beetles. The paucity of characters of most of the fossils of supposed Scarabaeoidea prevents their inclusion in a reliable phylogenetic analysis. Only rarely can an autapomorphy of Scarabaeoidea be seen in a fossil classified as a member of this group. Therefore, the classification of Mesozoic and Tertiary fossils is often t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
95
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While dinosaurs are known since Triassic, Scarabeids are present in the fossil record only since Upper Jurassic of Karatau, Kazakhstan (Krell 2000(Krell , 2006Scholtz 1990) but features that could be interpreted as adaptations for coprophagy are ambiguous. Indeed coprophagy traces are known in vertebrate coprolites (not only dinosaurs) since the Triassic, so they could not be attributed to Scarabaeidae but probably to Diptera larvae (Wahl et al 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While dinosaurs are known since Triassic, Scarabeids are present in the fossil record only since Upper Jurassic of Karatau, Kazakhstan (Krell 2000(Krell , 2006Scholtz 1990) but features that could be interpreted as adaptations for coprophagy are ambiguous. Indeed coprophagy traces are known in vertebrate coprolites (not only dinosaurs) since the Triassic, so they could not be attributed to Scarabaeidae but probably to Diptera larvae (Wahl et al 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The oldest body fossils attributed to Scarabaeoidea are from the Late Jurassic, the oldest Scarabaeidae are Early Cretaceous, and the earliest fossils from the subfamily Dynastinae are found in the Eocene (Krell, 2000(Krell, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Crowson (1981) presumed that it is a scarabaeid, but since the remains lack all appendages and the posterior part of elytra and abdomen, there is no real evidence enabling it to be classified in the Scarabaeoidea. A ‘ Melolontha ?’ described from the Lower Jurassic of England (Brodie, 1845) based on a fossil resembling the outline of the pygidium of some extant species of Melolontha , is so incomplete so that we cannot even be sure it is an insect (Krell, 2000). Although Ponomarenko (Ponomarenko, 1995) gave the minimum age for Scarabaeoidea as the Middle Jurassic, the fossil record of this era is even less promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies on the phylogeny of some extant families, subfamilies or tribes of Scarabaeoidea from some areas of the world have been inferred (Browne & Scholtz, 1995; Browne & Scholtz, 1999; Holloway, 1960; Hunt et al ., 2007; McKenna & Farrell, 2009; Ocampo, 2006; Reyes‐Castillo, 1970; Scholtz, 1986; Scholtz & Browne, 1996). Since there seems lacking convincing evidence that any Jurassic fossil so far known belongs to the Scarabaeoidea (Krell, 2000; Scholtz & Grebennikov, 2005), there is the current opinion that most scarab families may have originated in the Cretaceous (Krell, 2000; McKenna & Farrell, 2009). Since no study on the phylogeny of extant and extinct Scarabaeoidea has been done so far, the divergence times of most scarab families remain widely uncertain (McKenna & Farrell, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%