2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fractional Fourier transform as a biomedical signal and image processing tool: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, they proposed a classifier fusion strategy that combined predictions from different classifiers using majority voting. The experimental results demonstrated that by utilizing learned image features and the classification fusion strategy, the recall and F1-score were further improved to 99.20% and 99.40%, respectively [32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, they proposed a classifier fusion strategy that combined predictions from different classifiers using majority voting. The experimental results demonstrated that by utilizing learned image features and the classification fusion strategy, the recall and F1-score were further improved to 99.20% and 99.40%, respectively [32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In recent years, many new wavelet transform methods have emerged in various signal processing applications, such as image processing, audio processing, and biomedical engineering [21][22][23]. These methods include non-orthogonal wavelet transforms and continuous wavelet transforms.…”
Section: Traditional Wavelet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of chirp signals either increases (up-chirp) or decreases (down-chirp) with time [23]. They are frequently encountered in various signal processing applications, such as sonar [24], radar, and biomedical devices [25]. Some of these applications rely on chirp signal transmission as in the case of sonar [24], while others model the received signal after Doppler spread as chirp signals, e.g., in synthetic aperture radars (SARs) [26], and heart sound signals [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%