2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.565408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The French 35-Hour Experience: Impacts on Employment and Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that wages are based on working hours, the marginal cost of hiring an additional worker will also increase ( MC N ) in response to rise in overtime hours owing to work‐sharing arrangements ( h − h s ). As seen in Equation (3), the marginal cost of hiring an additional worker ( MC N ) will increase in response to work‐sharing arrangements:(Equation 6) (Equation 7)On the other hand, based on Cahuc and Carcillo (2011) and Gills (2004), we built the standard program of optimization of a consumer‐employee of type i whose utility function u i is a quasi‐concave and is strictly increasing based on two arguments: For each type of work, the productivity of a worker is measured by the parameter θ >0. A worker productivity θ produces a quantity θf ( H ), f (0)=0, f ′>0. f ″<0, when the worker work the hours h where h = h s + h OT ( i ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that wages are based on working hours, the marginal cost of hiring an additional worker will also increase ( MC N ) in response to rise in overtime hours owing to work‐sharing arrangements ( h − h s ). As seen in Equation (3), the marginal cost of hiring an additional worker ( MC N ) will increase in response to work‐sharing arrangements:(Equation 6) (Equation 7)On the other hand, based on Cahuc and Carcillo (2011) and Gills (2004), we built the standard program of optimization of a consumer‐employee of type i whose utility function u i is a quasi‐concave and is strictly increasing based on two arguments: For each type of work, the productivity of a worker is measured by the parameter θ >0. A worker productivity θ produces a quantity θf ( H ), f (0)=0, f ′>0. f ″<0, when the worker work the hours h where h = h s + h OT ( i ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, based on Cahuc and Carcillo (2011) and Gills (2004), we built the standard program of optimization of a consumer‐employee of type i whose utility function u i is a quasi‐concave and is strictly increasing based on two arguments: For each type of work, the productivity of a worker is measured by the parameter θ >0. A worker productivity θ produces a quantity θf ( H ), f (0)=0, f ′>0. f ″<0, when the worker work the hours h where h = h s + h OT ( i ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%