2001
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2001.9517658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) of New Zealand: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with re-descriptions of the type species, P.fragilis, and of P. propinquus from Stewart Island (M. A. Chapman unpubl. data) it will enable corrections to the generic characteristics defined by Barnard & Barnard (1983) and Fenwick (2001a). Both species can be recognised during initial sample sorting by the dorsal spines on the urosomal segments and the elongated 3rd uropods (though some marine and brackish-water genera share this character).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with re-descriptions of the type species, P.fragilis, and of P. propinquus from Stewart Island (M. A. Chapman unpubl. data) it will enable corrections to the generic characteristics defined by Barnard & Barnard (1983) and Fenwick (2001a). Both species can be recognised during initial sample sorting by the dorsal spines on the urosomal segments and the elongated 3rd uropods (though some marine and brackish-water genera share this character).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chilton's descriptions and records amplified but sometimes confused the pioneer studies of the more reliable G. M. Thomson. Neither generic or specific boundaries are well defined morphologically for any New Zealand freshwater amphipod taxa (Fenwick 2001) and hence it is difficult to assess the importance of the genetic differences between P. excavatum and C. lucasi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently (Hurley 1954(Hurley , 1975Barnard 1972;Chapman & Lewis 1976;Barnard & Karaman 1991;Fenwick 2001), the corophiid fauna of New Zealand was thought to include a freshwater species in an endemic genus, Chaetocorophium lucasi (Hurley, 1954), known then from three central North Island lakes but now also from coastal habitats , and an upper estuarine species, Paracorophium excavatum (Thomson, 1884). New studies have revealed a situation of considerable taxonomic and ecological complexity, with evidence of morphological confusion between P. excavatum, the type species of the genus, and a related Australian species, P. brisbanensis (Chapman 2002), and also of possible cryptic speciation (as shown by allozyme analyses) within the New Zealand ChaetocorophiumParacorophium complex Schnabel et al , 2000Stevens & Hogg unpubl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were dissected in glycerol and mounted in glycerine jelly with Rose Bengal as a stain. Hypogean animals were collected as in Fenwick (2001). Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little further has been published on them since except for a brief account in Chapman & Lewis (1976) which drew mainly on Hurley's (1954) work. Fenwick (2001) reviewed their taxonomic history and collated many records of hypogean phreatogammarids (Fenwick 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%